The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) held a virtual meeting titled Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee on Friday, September 17th.
As they described it on their YouTube channel, “Join us for a Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting to discuss Pfizer-BioNTech’s supplemental Biologics License Application for administration of a third dose, or “booster” dose, of the COVID-19 vaccine, Comirnaty, in individuals 16 years of age and older.”
TIRED OF THE ADS? BECOME A PREMIUM USER TODAY!!
It was an eight-hour virtual meeting (Full video at the bottom of this article), but we found a few bombshell clips that destroyed the official narrative.
Here’s the first clip from Steve Kirsch, Executive Director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund:
Hi, I’m Steve Kirsch. I’m the Executive Director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund. I have no conflicts. Advanced to slide number four with the elephants. I’m going to focus my remarks today on the elephant in the room that nobody likes to talk about, that the vaccines kill more people than they save. Today we focus almost exclusively on COVID death saves and vaccine efficacy because we were led to believe that vaccines are perfectly safe. But this is simply not true. For example, there are four times as many heart attacks in the treatment group in the Pfizer six-month trial report. That wasn’t bad luck. There is shows heart attacks happen 71 times more often following these vaccines compared to any other vaccine. In all 20 people died, who got the drug, 14 died who got the placebo. Few people notice that if the net all-cause mortality from the vaccines is negative. Vaccines, boosters, and mandates are all nonsensical. This is the case today. Death rates. Let’s slide number seven advanced to the number seven in the lower part. This shows that the all-cause death light rate and in three cases, only the VAERS numbers are statistically significant, but the other numbers are troubling. Even if the vaccines had 100% protection, it still means we killed two people to save one life. Four experts did analyses using completely different Non-U.S. data sources, and all of them came up with approximately the same number of excess vaccine-related deaths, about 411 deaths per million doses. That translates into 150,000 people have died. The next slide would be slide number 11—the nursing home. Now the real numbers confirm that we kill more than we saved. And I would love everyone to look at the Israel Ministry of health data on the 90 plus-year-olds where we went from a 94.4% vaccinated group to 82.9% vaccinated in the last four months. In the most optimistic scenario, it means that 50% of the vaccinated people died, and 0% of unvaccinated people died. Unless you can explain that to the American public. You cannot approve the boosters” – Steve Kirsch, Executive Director of COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund
Why aren’t the Big Media outlets blasting this information out all over the place?
That wasn’t the only bombshell clip from the meeting.
Check this one out from Dr. Jessica Rose:
MORE NEWS: Must See: Lara Logan’s Response To ‘Where Do We Stand Right Now In This Country?’ [VIDEO]
“My name is Dr. Jessica Rose, and I’m a viral immunologist and computational biologist. This is a bar plot that shows the past ten years of VAERS data plotted against the total number of adverse event reports for all vaccines for the year 2011 through 2020. And for COVID-associated products only for 2021. The left box represents all adverse event reports. And the right-hand column represents all deaths adverse event reports. There’s an over 1,000% increase in the total number of adverse events for 2021, and we are not done with 2021. This is highly anomalous on both fronts. These increased reporting rates are not due to increased rates in injections and not due to simulated reporting. This has been shown using a comparative analysis of influenza data. The onus is on the public health officials, the FDA, the CDC, and policymakers to answer to these anomalies and acknowledge the clear risk signals emerging from VAERS data, and to confront the issue of COVID injectable products huge risks that, in my opinion, outweigh any potential benefits associated with these products, especially for children. This is a time series plot that shows the total cumulative number of cardiovascular, immunological, and neurological adverse events for 2021 associated with COVID products. For the cumulative absolute counts are normalized for the total number of fully injected individuals in the U.S., We can see that one and 660 individuals are succumbing to and REPORTING immunological adverse events associated with the COVID product. The underreporting factor is NOT considered here. This is a phylogenetic tree showing the emergence of the Alpha against Delta variants of COVID-19 over time. The emergence of both of these variants and their subsequent clustering arose in very close temporal proximity to the rollout of the COVID product in Israel. Israel is one of the most injected countries, and it appears from this data that this represents a clear failure of these products to provide protective immunity against emergent variants and to prevent transmission, regardless of how many additional shots administered. And this begs the question as to whether these injection rollouts are driving the emergence of the new variants. There’s a clear and present danger of the emergence of variants of concern if we continue with these alleged booster shots. Thank you.” – Dr. Jessica Rose
That’s just two clips from the eight-hour meeting, but you can check out the entire discussion here:
Cut Out Big Tech And Advertise With Red Voice Media Directly
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
The Scientific Method requires us to study, research, adjust our findings based on new data and to continue to evolve our viewpoints. People who truly “follow the science” subscribe to this and are open to diverse ideas and perspectives.
However, the people who claim to “follow the science” are often highly indoctrinated in the political propaganda of the day. What they call “science” is really a “narrative” with no freedom of discussion, exploration, data analysis or peer reviewed sources. This “Indoctrinated” group often calls the true scientists names like “conspiracy theorists” or “the world is flat -science deniers”. This happened to me recently by a friend of mine. They often throw in other insults when you threaten their narrative – but it is by these very insults and false claims that you know they are afraid of what you have to say.
In order to have true science, we need to start with a hypothesis. Most intelligent people are skeptical of extremes like 100%, completely correct, all true. Most Curious people are willing to think outside the box, experiment with new ideas, discuss the “what ifs” on topics. So let’s not take this article as gospel but let’s consider some alternative viewpoints. Don’t let the title scare you but step inside the debate and let me know what you think 🤔