According to a report from the United Kingdom, it appears that the Covid-19 vaccine inhibits the body’s ability to naturally produce antibodies making vaccinated people more susceptible to catching the virus.
The information can be found in the UK Government’s most recent, Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report. The report states that “N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who acquire infection following two doses of vaccination.” According to vaccine researcher Alex Berenson, this essentially means that vaccinated people who have become infected will never acquire complete immunity to the coronavirus.
TIRED OF THE ADS? BECOME A PREMIUM USER TODAY!!
“What the British are saying is they are now finding the vaccine interferes with your body’s innate ability after infection to produce antibodies against not just the spike protein but other pieces of the virus. Specifically, vaccinated people don’t seem to be producing antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein, the shell of the virus, which is a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people. Vaccinated people will be far more vulnerable to mutations in the spike protein EVEN AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN INFECTED AND RECOVERED ONCE,” – Alex Berenson.
“It also means the virus is likely to select for mutations that go in exactly that direction because those will essentially give it an enormous vulnerable population to infect. And it probably is still more evidence the vaccines may interfere with the development of robust long-term immunity post-infection.” – Alex Berenson.
Berenson’s research aligns with similar research from an Illinois physician who found that the vaccine suppresses the body’s adaptive immune system, making them more susceptible to catching the illness. The Illinois physician believed that this explained “breakthrough” infections.
“If they have this low [immunity] and it stays, and it persists… and that adaptive immune system response persists… it’s going to have a bad response to any other kind of viral infection. If you looked at that blood work, would you say that this person is very susceptible to having another viral infection, and maybe…you just might call it a breakthrough infection, you guys see that? A breakthrough infection. Could it be that after this maybe this is happening in a lot of people and leaving them wide open to have breakthrough infections after that?” – Dr. Nathan Thompson
Despite all the research and evidence that the vaccines are ineffective in preventing the coronavirus, the government continues to push people to get vaccinated. They refuse to look at the whole picture and continue to paint the image they want you to believe. Making sure they leave out anything that might destroy the story they are trying to build that fits their narrative.
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
Biden is trying to get rid of American citizen and keep the illegal immigrants alive. He is a danger to Americans.
80% of eligible UK citizens are COVID “vaccinated.” Essentially, what this means is that the “vaccines” are ineffective. On the other side of this, there are the “vaccine” injuries and deaths, and the unknown long-term consequences. Basically, people are risking their lives for absolutely no significant gain. It would be like betting your last dollar on a lame horse. You give up something with not even the possibility of winning the bet. In the case of these “vaccines,” if you lose, you may die.
I am pro-choice about COVID, not pro-vax. However, I find some errors with this article. First, you never take ONE study as gospel. Secondly, although Alex B. is doing the world a service with his reporting on the COVID vaccine saga, he has no medical background and often misreads/misrepresents the data. Here, he doesn’t seem to understand that the fall in N-type antibodies – if indeed that does happen (which we don’t know after one study) – is likely temporary in nature. Also, the article talks about “total immunity” and there is no such thing: not in any person, vaccinated or not. You will never attain total immunity. So to be arguing over whether it is 92% or 93% seems pretty silly to me. I am interested in REAL problems with these vaccines, which I believe there are, and I believe we will only know for certain what they do after a lot of time and research; I see many articles like this one, which through ignorance are truly spreading false alarm, and that doesn’t help anyone make a sound decision.
Unfortunately what Alex and this article fail to mention is the rate of death. There are still more unvaccinated people dying per 100K compared to vaccinated if you read the report.
I find that rate of death data to be confusing, to say the least. The report itself cautions against use of it, in an unclearly worded section.
To calculate the rate of death, It assumes that they know the numbers of the population which is unvaccinated in every age group. (Do they?)
The data in table 4 seems a little far-fetched to me. For example, using the 50-59 year olds, unvaccinated deaths = 112; Vaxxed deaths = 124, which supposedly corresponds to reported rates of death per 100k of 11 and 1.8. For this to be true, vaccination rates would have to be 6.8 times the rate of unvaxxed (11/1.8 * 124/112). That is, the vaxxed population is more than 85% of the population in age group 50-59. For >80 yo, the numbers are (134.5/56.7 * 1457/169) 20.5 times as many vaxxed as unvaxxed, or more than 95% of 80 year olds are vaxxed.
Those are the numbers you have to believe for those death rates to be true.
100 correct
Yet another piece of evidence that the ‘vaccine’ is completely useless for anything except for hastening your death. Do you think this information will prevent people rushing to get the booster ? Don’t hold your breath. The sheeple will follow the herd to the slaughter house like lemmings !
This points to the same 70% of non-placebo jabbed will die within 3 years based on the lowest VAERS numbers, known to be set to acknowledge only one in 100 actual jab-deaths. The above conservative estimate was made pre-chain-booster-syndrome.