According to reports, the United States is restricting travel for non-citizens from South Africa and seven other countries amidst the news of a novel COVID variant reportedly emerging from the region. Ironically, when the former administration did the same with regard to China, screams of racism were cropping up everywhere regarding the early 2020 decision.

Apparently, there’s a new COVID variant in town, or rather, one in the South African region, that has compelled travel restrictions that will go into effect come November 29th.

Tired of the ads? Go Ad-Free and Get EXCLUSIVE Content From Stew Peters and the RVM Team, Become a PREMIUM USER

Sign the petition: Ban Federal Vaccine Mandates! >

The United States will restrict travel for non-citizens from South Africa, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Namibia, Lesotho, Eswatini, Mozambique, and Malawi in light of the newly dubbed “Omicron” variant of COVID, that was designated with said name by the World Health Organization on November 26th.

President Joe Biden was reportedly briefed on the aforementioned COVID mutation on the same day it was named as the Omicron variant by Dr. Anthony Fauci, and reportedly Canada, the European Union, and the U.K have announced similar travel restrictions regarding the South African region in light of the news.

New Scandemic Alert: Are You Afraid Of Monkeypox?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from Red Voice Media, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Health officials are vigorously working to understand the new COVID strain to understand the transmissibility and severity of infections with regard to those who’ve received their COVID jabs. A report from CNBC noted that the variant carries “an unusual constellation of mutations and a profile that is different from other variants of concern.”

>>>Follow Us On GAB<<<

It is particularly notable that with the quick enactment of a travel ban in response to this new COVID variant under the current administration, there is hardly a peep of pushback or criticism from the media or officials claiming this is a needless, racist, or xenophobic move.

But that wasn’t the case when former President Trump enacted a near-synonymous travel restriction back on January 31st, 2020, with respect to China and the then-novel coronavirus. A report from Politico published days after the 2020 travel restriction. It was reported that the travel restrictions could result in “stigmatizing people of Asian descent.”

In February 2020, the Boston Globe called the travels restrictions related to China “Trump’s xenophobic travel ban.” And of course, there was the March 2020 tweet from then-candidate Joe Biden where he stated travel bans “will not stop” COVID from spreading.

***Follow Us On TELEGRAM***

Follow Us On GETTR

It’s rather interesting how the tide and sentiments change when someone else is in the proverbial driver’s seat – considering all that criticism of xenophobia, ineffectiveness, and the sort goes right out the window when someone who isn’t named Trump is doing the same exact thing.


The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Red Voice Media. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary. Red Voice Media would like to make a point of clarification on why we do not refer to any shot related to COVID-19 as a "vaccine." According to the CDC, the definition of a vaccine necessitates that said vaccine have a lasting effect of at least one year in preventing the contraction of the virus or disease it's intended to fight. Because all of the COVID-19 shots thus far available have barely offered six months of protection, and even then not absolute, Red Voice Media has made the decision hereafter to no longer refer to the Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson substances as vaccinations.