Catch every segment of the show at StewPeters.TV
Over the weekend kid-sized needles were injected into the arms of millions of American children after jabs were approved for 5-11 years old’s, but is it even legal? Dr. Jane Ruby joins Stew to detail how all Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) are medically criminal and lack real scientific backing.
Go Ad-Free, Get Exclusive Content, Become a Premium User.
Follow Stew on social media.
MORE NEWS: New C19 Boosters Are ‘Totally Useless’: Doctors Peter McCullough and Harvey Risch [VIDEO]
Follow Red Voice Media on social media.
See all of Stew’s content at StewPeters.TV.
Watch full episodes here.
Check out Stew’s store.
Support our efforts to keep the truth alive.
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
Out of curiosity I looked at CVS scheduling website yesterday and all the CVS stores around me are booked up for vaccines right through November 27. Last week it was walk-in. I guess many. many parents are running as fast as they can to get their kids killed.
Jonestown!
Incredibly sad!!!
I have become convinced that any parent to order their child to be injected with this or any so-called vaccine, must hate being a parent and must hate their child!
Kerry, you are being ridiculous. Generally speaking ALL parents love their children and make decisions based on their well-being.
This is not a vaccine- it is a bioweapon…. We need to refer to it for what it is.
Blame the PARENTS. THEY are allowing it!
So tragic, maybe the injection already is making them do what they wouldn’t do otherwise.
And everyone in government, assume we’re on our own, prepare to be over run by zombies and big shutdowns, really.
Trump is part of the globalist murder machine, there’s no way he’s not aware, it’s all theatre. He pissed on America on 911 with Rudy removing evidence, he knew everything and did nothing. Love Miss Ruby, my kind of woman/lady.
Thank you Jane Ruby and Stew Peters for bringing David Martin’s message to our arena…this is a dark time in human history, yet a time of opportunity to take back our rights and freedom!
I went to the WHO website here
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/considerations-regarding-consent-in-vaccinating-children-and-adolescents-between-6-and-17-years-old
and read the document she references myself. In fact, it says
“In a legal sense, school or local welfare or other
community authorities, do not have the capacity
to consent to medical interventions on behalf of
the children in their care. Exceptions, stipulated in
local laws and regulations, may exist in defined,
special situations…”
So it does NOT say that simply being in school implies consent.
Good eye, i also went to review the document and looked of section 3 and it does indicate,
“Subsequently, the physical presence of the child or adolescent, with or without an
accompanying parent at the vaccination session, is considered to imply consent.” This indicates vaccination session…which the following sentence indicates “This practice is based on the opt-out principle and parents who do not consent to vaccination are expected implicitly to take steps to ensure that their child or adolescent
does not participate in the vaccination session. This may include not letting the child or adolescent attend school on a vaccination day, if vaccine delivery occurs through schools.”
HOWEVER: Looking further in the document it does say this, “Whether consent is needed for mandatory vaccination depends on the legal nature of the regulations. When mandatory vaccination is established in relevant provisions in law, consent may not be required. If the mandatory nature of vaccination is based on policy, or other forms of soft law, informed consent needs to be obtained as for any other vaccines.”
Now as parent(s), ask yourself the question would policy makers or those in authority look at the entirety of the document or would they tend to lean on what they think is ‘best’. “Exceptions, stipulated in local laws and regulations, may exist in defined,
special situations”
So i read the document given and the reality we all have to understand or face is, what would those who are in authority do? If they ‘feel’ its their moral obligation to put some type of product to ‘save’ the children what do you think will happen?
Pu$$y Grabber was just on Fox and could have easily said something about the dangers to the kiddos, but didn’t seem to think that was important. (he was specifically asked about it too) But he did remind the viewers that he was responsible for getting the vaccine out in record time. Why would you expect anything different? Yup, go Pu$$y Grabber.
https://fullfact.org/online/vaccine-informed-consent/
This article says that parents would be alerted FIRST if there is going to be a vax clinic in the school. Therefore, if the child attends on that day, then it is “implied consent.”
FYI: I am not jabbed & am an anti-vaxxer since 1978.I agree that this whole Covid episode is a crime against humanity. I just want to be really clear about what I send to my children/grandchildren, family members & friends. Many already think that I have become a “conspiracy theorist” so I don’t want to fuel that fire of disbelief.
The WHO’s original definition of a pandemic from May 1, 2009, specified simultaneous epidemics worldwide “with enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses:”
“An influenza pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several, simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.”
This definition was changed in the month leading up to the 2009 swine flu pandemic, removing the severity and high mortality criteria and leaving the definition of a pandemic as “a worldwide epidemic of a disease.”
This switch in definition allowed WHO to declare swine flu a pandemic after only 144 people had died from the infection worldwide, and it’s why COVID-19 is still promoted as a pandemic even though plenty of data suggest the lethality of COVID-19 is on par with the seasonal flu.
Now the worlds even more upside down