BOSTON, MA – The city of Boston announced on December 20th a new phase that will come into effect by mid-January of 2022 that will effectively ban nearly anyone who hasn’t gotten a COVID jab from entering or even holding jobs at indoor establishments within the city.
Come January 15th of 2022, if one doesn’t have proof handy that they’ve gotten a COVID jab, then they’re going to be banned from basically every in-door venue, meaning eateries, bars, nightclubs, fitness centers, movie theaters, music venues – ostensibly any location that services customers indoors.
The only indoor places that aren’t covered by this mandate are department/grocery stores and soup kitchens.
And, according to the impending mandate, the city is devising their own iteration of “no jab, no job.”
“Employees working in those spaces will also be required to be vaccinated,” the mandate reads. “Covered businesses are responsible for checking proof of vaccination and posting a notice about the COVID-19 vaccine requirement.”
According to the order, there are phases associated with this rollout that compel not only adults but also children as young as five years old who would have to be jabbed in order to be allowed anywhere detailed as a “covered entity” within the mandate:
- Saturday, January 15 – People age 12+ must show proof of one dose of vaccine
- Tuesday, February 15 – People age 12+ must show proof of full vaccination
- Tuesday, March 1 – Children age five-11 must show proof of one dose of vaccine
- Sunday, May 1 – People age five and up must show proof of full vaccination
The fact that young children would effectively be forced into getting jabbed if they want to enjoy a movie or bite out to eat with their family is concerning, as The Harvard Gazette even mentioned that in “rare instances, the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is linked to myocarditis, which is an inflammation of the heart. When this occurs, it is mostly seen in young males following their second dose of an mRNA vaccine.”
Perhaps the most alarming language provided in the guidance for the mandate comes under the “Additional Questions” section where the topic of “What if a person states that they cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons” is addressed.
“Covered businesses must require proof of vaccination,” the guidance says. “If a customer requests an exemption from the vaccine requirement due to a disability, engage with them in a cooperative dialogue to see if a reasonable accommodation is possible. A business does not have to provide a reasonable accommodation if doing so would create a direct threat (including contact with an unvaccinated individual) for other customers or employees of the business, or impose an undue hardship on the business.”
In that line of guidance regarding the mandate, the city of Boston has labeled anyone who hasn’t been jabbed with a COVID shot “a direct threat.” Such language is extremely disturbing.
Those who won’t or are medically unable to comply with the COVID jab policy in Boston are in store for an effective ostracization from society come January.
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Red Voice Media. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary. Red Voice Media would like to make a point of clarification on why we do not refer to any shot related to COVID-19 as a "vaccine." According to the CDC, the definition of a vaccine necessitates that said vaccine have a lasting effect of at least one year in preventing the contraction of the virus or disease it's intended to fight. Because all of the COVID-19 shots thus far available have barely offered six months of protection, and even then not absolute, Red Voice Media has made the decision hereafter to no longer refer to the Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson substances as vaccinations.