On Tuesday, Vice President Kamala Harris sat down with NBC anchor Craig Melvin to speak about some of the hot issues currently plaguing America. Although the media has been known to be relaxed when it comes to the Biden administration, Melvin appeared not to hold back as he questioned the VP about voting rights and the highly controversial COVID-19 pandemic.

Tired of the ads? Go Ad-Free and Get EXCLUSIVE Content, Become a PREMIUM USER

And while Harris appeared to be somewhat agitated at times by Melvin’s persistence, the Vice President seemed to come out of the interview unscathed. At least, that was until a body language expert investigated the footage. 

Speaking on Newsmax, Gregory Hartley, a behavior and body language expert, analyzed the interview with Harris and pointed out how not only are her answers already determined, but everything down to her hand movements are all a way to deflect the questions being asked and make it appear the Biden administration is still in control of situations like COVID-19. 

While there is no denying VP Harris is a much better speaker than Biden, even she appeared to get heated when Melvin brought up the possibility of her being replaced in 2024 by Liz Cheney. Harris quickly retorted, “I’m sorry, we are thinking about today. I mean, honestly, I know why you’re asking the question because this is the part of the punditry and the gossip around places like Washington, D.C. Let me just tell you something. We’re focused on the things in front of us. We’re focused on what we need to do to address issues like affordable child care–”

Even after Melvin would ask the question again, cutting off Harris, she replied, “The American people sent us here to do a job. And right now, there’s a lot of work to be done, and that’s my focus. Sincerely.”

<Support Our Efforts To Keep Truth Alive>

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Red Voice Media. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary. Red Voice Media would like to make a point of clarification on why we do not refer to any shot related to COVID-19 as a "vaccine." According to the CDC, the definition of a vaccine necessitates that said vaccine have a lasting effect of at least one year in preventing the contraction of the virus or disease it's intended to fight. Because all of the COVID-19 shots thus far available have barely offered six months of protection, and even then not absolute, Red Voice Media has made the decision hereafter to no longer refer to the Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson substances as vaccinations.