Catch every segment of the show at StewPeters.TV
Go Ad-Free, Get Exclusive Content, Become a Premium User.
MORE NEWS: New C19 Boosters Are ‘Totally Useless’: Doctors Peter McCullough and Harvey Risch [VIDEO]
Bombshell developments happened this week in the quest for Covid-19’s origins, courtesy of Project Veritas.
On Monday, James O’Keefe’s outfit released unearthed documents from a DARPA fellow, Marine Corps Major Joseph Murphy, who claims to know, with certainty, that Covid was lab-engineered, and that vaccines aren’t working due to special lab-tweaked aspects of the virus.
Major Murphy also admitted that both ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are cures for Covid, and that this has been known since early 2020. Veritas also uncovered a 2018 DARPA letter rejecting funding for an EcoHealth Alliance proposal to engineer novel bat coronaviruses and then release them into the wild.
“DARPA’s letter bluntly says that EcoHealth Alliance was getting too close to prohibited gain-of-function research … good on DARPA for rejecting the proposal, but that wasn’t the only place they could have gone for funding,” Stew Peters said. “The other place they could go? None other than the National Institutes of Health, and the section of it managed by one Anthony Fauci.”
On Wednesday, biotech analyst Karen Kingston joined the Stew Peters Show to reveal the rest of the story, honing in on aspects that most media outlets missed.
“Basically the document is funding for these bioweapons,” Karen Kingston told Stew Peters. “It’s very alarming what they were requesting funding for … under section 2, the technical approach, they clearly state, ‘we’ll sequence the spike protein reverse engineer them’ to conduct binding assays, and insert them into bat SARS-CoV proteins.”
“They go on to say that they’re going to reconstruct these chimeric viruses that cause SARS-like illnesses in humanized-mice,” Kingston continued. “They’re creating a virus that won’t respond to a vaccine and won’t be neutralized by a monoclonal antibody.”
“They also provided the payroll for this project,, if you go to the budget pages you can see right there, they have Dr. Zhengli Shi on payroll, she was actually $25.56 an hour, Dr. Peng Zhou and [Dr.] Ben Hu,” Kingston told Stew. “So they actually have the payroll of the scientists who work for the CCP who created the bioweapon.”
“In the simplest terms … we now know that this was a chimerically released set of symptoms, and it was intentionally released, that the Wuhan Institute of Virology is basically a bioweapons lab,” Stew Peters said to Kingston. “Are you saying that Fauci and company basically this is premeditated genocide?”
“The only purpose of this research was to weaponize viruses to cause disease, disabilities and death,” Kingston responded in agreement. “It’s a bioweapon.”
“The shot is the end game, that’s the bioweapon that is going to kill,” Stew Peters summarized.
“SARS CoV-2 is a vaccine, the original formulation, in this document, is an aerosol formulation, so the primary mode for infecting people … theoretically would be spraying an area, such as a New York City subway station,” Kingston shockingly concluded. “That would be an optimal way of disseminating what they are calling the vaccine.”
Follow Stew on social media.
Follow Red Voice Media on social media.
See all of Stew’s content at StewPeters.TV.
Watch full episodes here.
Check out Stew’s store.
Support our efforts to keep the truth alive.
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Red Voice Media. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary. Red Voice Media would like to make a point of clarification on why we do not refer to any shot related to COVID-19 as a "vaccine." According to the CDC, the definition of a vaccine necessitates that said vaccine have a lasting effect of at least one year in preventing the contraction of the virus or disease it's intended to fight. Because all of the COVID-19 shots thus far available have barely offered six months of protection, and even then not absolute, Red Voice Media has made the decision hereafter to no longer refer to the Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson substances as vaccinations.
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
Adverse reactions, to the mRNA-Shot produced synthetic spike protein, are the same as the adverse reactions, to the synthetic SARSr-CoV-WIV spike protein.
‘mRNA’ Shots do not provide protection because the mRNA-Shot produced synthetic spike protein is just a replication, of the already-synthetic SARSr-CoV-WIV spike proteins, and, therefore, possess no other Epitopes [i.e. part of spike protein, that Human immune T-Cells, and, B-Cells can recognize, and attach to].
It is known in research that a few Covid injections do in fact provide immunity for a certain time despite its horrendous further effects and deaths, but then, because the antibodies of the virus are short-lived, which remains generally denied but which is a known peculiarity with Coronaviruses like e.g. the common Cold, continuously further injections would be needed to support vaccine-produced antibodies to battle the virus. This is where boosters come in. Conclusion: Vaccines are not a correct means to immunise for a Coronavirus, but supplementation that strengthens the immune system.
Thank you for giving us a platform to speak.
(First of all, the following is a science discussion and one’s person has nothing to do with this)
Information on the virus being in the vax is not really there.
It must be stipulated here, such assumptions resulting in a statement is a result of a personal presupposition or conclusion resulting in a conviction.
The connection is that all alternative media and beyond has lately been turned into the persuasion, induced from higher above, that the virus would not be that dangerous or be real, resulting in quite a lot of people accepting the virus would not be dangerous or even exist i.e. resulting in a conviction which truly has no basis in reality.
Once again, the tactic here is to make people believe the virus is not real or not that dangerous, so that people spontaneously infect themselves more and more, driving the pandemic ever higher and not letting it come to an end, (ultimately) creating (prolonged) reason for vax propaganda and vax enforcement.
It points to a good way of researching that such possibility is looked at, and diverse materials are sought for to support the search and its result, but then this must also be addressed in this way i.e. without convincing.
Furthermore, it is known that a similar-like spike protein is found in the virus as compared to the vax, and this may result in similar-like symptoms in both, although, arguably, the vax is much worse, and in many ways
(explanation: Oncolytic Products (vector products based on bacteria and viruses etc) are presumed to be no longer infectious after a month, as is stated by the CDC.
So, despite the great diversity of severe and horrendous effects of the injectable, Oncolytic products in the vax, incl in the mRNA’s – as was leaked through Project Veritas -, the injection would thus also possibly be infectious up to a month, at least concerning aerosolisation, but the virus may be continuously further spreading, be newly acquired and mutate).
Concerning an infection with the virus, it can happen that no antibodies are formed in the body or disappear quickly, which is generally denied in the media, by what means, the virus becomes undetectable, and from this a proof results that the actual number of people infected with the virus is far far higher than publicly revealed.
An infection by the virus goes all around the system and may affect all organs.
There is no need for spraying this virus, because it is superbe infectious on its own.
It’s important that the virus is rightly tackled because it is the driving force to promote injection.