With the Supreme Court hearing the debate over the Biden administration trying to force the jab on the country, Americans were hoping that the court would be the voice of reason between the people and the government. But that might not appear to be the case as Justice Sonia Sotomayor made some startling comments about the number of COVID-19 cases being seen in children. 

On Friday, Justice Sotomayor stated, “We have hospitals that are almost at full capacity with people severely ill on ventilators. We have over 100,000 children, which we’ve never had before, in serious condition, many on ventilators.”

Tired of the ads? Go Ad-Free and Get EXCLUSIVE Content, Become a PREMIUM USER

It wouldn’t be long after the Justice’s statements that CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky would be pressed on the matter. Even she admitted the number was far less than 100,000 and sits more around 3,500. She added, “While pediatric hospitalizations are rising, they are still about 15-fold less than hospitalizations of our older age demographics.”

But while some might just believe Sotomayor got her facts wrong or is just ignorant on the matter, Tucker Carlson spoke with JD Vance, a Republican running for Senate in Ohio, about the Biden administration and their COVID-19 agenda.

Although they might promote public safety and health, Vance pointed out how the evidence shows when it came to COVID-19, the main objective was turning a profit. Showing how a simple shred of misinformation can lead to hysteria and overreaction, Vance also placed the blame at the feet of President Joe Biden, who he said had “blood on his hands” for forcing the jab instead of offering multiple solutions. 

** Join Our Community **

If The 2024 Election Came Down To Ron DeSantis And Robert F. Kennedy Jr. | Who Would You Be Voting For?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from Red Voice Media, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

<Support Our Efforts To Keep Truth Alive>

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Red Voice Media. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary. Red Voice Media would like to make a point of clarification on why we do not refer to any shot related to COVID-19 as a "vaccine." According to the CDC, the definition of a vaccine necessitates that said vaccine have a lasting effect of at least one year in preventing the contraction of the virus or disease it's intended to fight. Because all of the COVID-19 shots thus far available have barely offered six months of protection, and even then not absolute, Red Voice Media has made the decision hereafter to no longer refer to the Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson substances as vaccinations.