NEW DEHLI, INDIA – After failing to fulfill India’s pharmaceutical regulator’s requirement for a local safety and immunogenicity study, Pfizer reportedly withdrew its application for emergency-use authorization of its COVID jab in the country, per a company statement delivered on February 4th.

Tired of the ads? Go Ad-Free and Get EXCLUSIVE Content, Become a PREMIUM USER

As a result of the decision, Pfizer’s COVID shot will not be available for purchase in the foreseeable future in neither India nor China, two of the most populated nations in the world. Apparently both countries have gone a different route when it pertains to their breed of COVID jabs being administered.

The backstory on Pfizer pulling out of trying to break into the India market is a unique one, as the company had apparently sought to bypass standard procedures that other COVID jab developers had to adhere to when being placed on the market in India.

Other companies who have foreign-developed COVID jabs participate in small-scale studies of their products in India, whereas Pfizer sought an exemption from such said typical practice by touting their trials that were conducted in countries like the United States and Germany.

However, that clearly didn’t assuage health officials in India.

The country’s drug regulator noted on their website that they couldn’t recommend Pfizer’s COVID jab due to there being ongoing research about side effects – a.k.a., adverse events and reactions – from the company’s jab abroad.

On February 2nd, Pfizer had a meeting with India’s Central Drugs Standard Control Organization which whatever was conveyed during such meeting clearly resulted in the decision two days later to pull out of getting their COVID shot approved for emergency use in the country.

** Join Our Community **

If The Election Was Today, Who Would Get Your Vote? - Trump or DeSantis?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from Red Voice Media, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Pfizer released a statement pertaining to the matter, saying they’ll “continue to engage” with officials in India “and re-submit” the application once they’re able to fulfill their requests.

“Based on the deliberations at the meeting and our understanding of additional information that the regulator may need, the company has decided to withdraw its application at this time. Pfizer will continue to engage with the authority and re-submit its approval request with additional information as it becomes available in the near future.”

The company has been pushing to get their COVID shot authorized in India since late 2021, but the country’s government opted to approve two different shots coming from Oxford University/AstraZeneca and another produced by India-based entity Bharat Biotech.

<Support Our Efforts To Keep Truth Alive>

Red Voice Media would like to make a point of clarification on why we do not refer to any shot related to COVID-19 as a "vaccine." According to the CDC, the definition of a vaccine necessitates that said vaccine have a lasting effect of at least one year in preventing the contraction of the virus or disease it's intended to fight. Because all of the COVID-19 shots thus far available have barely offered six months of protection, and even then not absolute, Red Voice Media has made the decision hereafter to no longer refer to the Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson substances as vaccinations.