In a  recent interview with CBC, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla reiterated his previously mentioned sentiments that those who he says spread purported misinformation about the COVID shots “are criminals.”

It was back in November that Bourla first attributed criminal behavior to alleged purveyors of misinformation regarding COVID shots, telling Atlantic Council CEO Frederick Kempe, “Those people are criminals. They’re not bad people. They’re criminals because they have literally cost millions of lives.”

Go Ad-Free, Get Exclusive Shows and Content, Go Premium Today - $1 Trial

Come March 29th, Bourla was at it again while speaking with CBC’s Andrew Chang. During the interview, Chang brought up Bourla’s November 2021 comments about those spreading COVID misinformation being “criminals.”

“All vaccine makers have faced the same challenge, and that is of misinformation. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe I’ve heard you talk about those who would deliberately peddle in misinformation as criminals. Is that something you stand by, that you believe in?”

Bourla quickly replied that he still holds these beliefs, claiming that the deaths of the unjabbed fall on the shoulders of those who’ve spread alleged misinformation regarding the COVID shots.

He went to far as to reference the types of articles he’s seen where people have come forward with either their personal jab-related injuries or telling the stories of loved ones they lost from taking the jab, calling these testimonials “lies.”

Join Our Community Of Patriots

“Yes, I do. Because they are literally cost lives. They know that what they’re saying is lying. But they do it despite that. There’s an article with picture of man’s wife ‘I forced her to get the vaccine and then because of the vaccine, she died.’ I realize, all of that lies of course. And they did it, why? Because they wanted to convince people that they were on the fence to do the vaccine or not, don’t do it. Look, his wife died. But forget that, that’s nothing compared to how many people didn’t do the vaccine and died because of that. So they are criminals.”

Who Would You Rather Be Stuck On A Deserted Island With?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from Red Voice Media, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Not only did Bourla claim that someone losing their wife over the COVID jab are “lies of course,” his statement on the matter maligns this person who shared their personal story of loss as being a criminal. Bourla is essentially claiming that anyone speaking out about COVID shot injuries and deaths are criminal.

In his own words, Bourla said that a man hypothetically losing his wife to these shots is “nothing compared to how many people” passed with COVID.

In Bourla’s mind, stories such as this man’s we covered here at Red Voice Media earlier in March is somehow “criminal” to draw awareness to, as if the concept of driving more informed consent is a bad thing when these shots have the propensity to cause serious harm to those who decide to participate in them.

Learn How To Protect Your Life Savings From Inflation and An Irresponsible Government, With Gold and Silver

Red Voice Media would like to make a point of clarification on why we do not refer to any shot related to COVID-19 as a "vaccine." According to the CDC, the definition of a vaccine necessitates that said vaccine have a lasting effect of at least one year in preventing the contraction of the virus or disease it's intended to fight. Because all of the COVID-19 shots thus far available have barely offered six months of protection, and even then not absolute, Red Voice Media has made the decision hereafter to no longer refer to the Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson substances as vaccinations.