A study coming out of Europe recently has claimed that instances of heart inflammation requiring hospitalization among those who’d received their COVID shots were higher than those who’d managed to avoid the jab.

In this study, over 23 million “Nordic residents” between Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden were followed up with between December of 2020 to October of 2021 – consisting of those jabbed and unjabbed – to monitor instances of myocarditis and pericarditis.

Go Ad-Free, Get Exclusive Shows and Content, Go Premium Today - $1 Trial

What the study found was those recipients of the Pfizer or Moderna brand of the COVID shot were more likely to come down with the aforementioned conditions versus those who remained unjabbed.

“In this cohort study of 23.1 million Nordic residents aged 12 years or older, the risk of myocarditis was higher within 28 days of vaccination with both BNT162b2 [Pfizer] and mRNA-1273 [Moderna] compared with being unvaccinated, and higher after the second dose of vaccine than the first dose.

“The risk was more pronounced after the second dose of mRNA-1273 than after the second dose of BNT162b2, and the risk was highest among males aged 16 to 24 years. Our data are compatible with 4 to 7 excess events within 28 days per 100 000 vaccines after a second dose of BNT162b2, and 9 to 28 excess events within 28 days per 100 000 vaccines after a second dose of mRNA-1273.”

This particular study was published by the Journal of the American Medical Association, which has been listed among the top five of the most “reputable international peer reviewed” medical journals.

Get A Great Night's Sleep and Support RVM With Big Discounts From MyPillow - Use Promo Code RVM

Dr. Rickard Ljung, one of the main researchers who worked on the European study, spoke with The Epoch Times about the findings, noting that Moderna’s Spikevax (the name of their COVID shot) presented 15 times of a greater risk of myocarditis and pericarditis versus those who steered clear of the COVID shots.

“These extra cases among men aged 16–24 correspond to a 5 times increased risk after Comirnaty and 15 times increased risk after Spikevax compared to unvaccinated.”

Despite these findings, the researchers affiliated with the study of course parroted the preferred narrative regarding the COVID shots, claiming that the benefits of the COVID jab “outweigh the risks of side effects,” namely due to these adverse events being “very rare.”

Dr. Peter McCullough finds this notion to be unacceptable, telling The Epoch Times that researchers brushing off heart-related injuries caused by any sort of novel vaccine is the antithesis of the modus operandi to develop life-saving medicine.

“In cardiology we spend our entire career trying to save every bit of heart muscle. We put in stents, we do heart catheterization, we do stress tests, we do CT angiograms. The whole game of cardiology is to preserve heart muscle. Under no circumstances would we accept a vaccine that causes even one person to stay sustain heart damage.

“Not one. And this idea that ‘Oh, we’re going to ask a large number of people to sustain heart damage for some other theoretical benefit for a viral infection,’ which for most is less than a common cold, is untenable. The benefits of the vaccines in no way outweigh the risks.”

Quick - Do This Before Biden “Fixes” Your Retirement Plan Next…

Red Voice Media would like to make a point of clarification on why we do not refer to any shot related to COVID-19 as a "vaccine." According to the CDC, the definition of a vaccine necessitates that said vaccine have a lasting effect of at least one year in preventing the contraction of the virus or disease it's intended to fight. Because all of the COVID-19 shots thus far available have barely offered six months of protection, and even then not absolute, Red Voice Media has made the decision hereafter to no longer refer to the Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson substances as vaccinations.