Catch every segment of the show at StewPeters.com
The U.S. Navy just suffered a big setback in its quest to impose the Covid vaccine onto the entire military.
Navy Lieutenant Billy Moseley has been in the service for twenty-two years. When the vaccine order came down, he could have chosen to simply retire rather than get the jab. But Moseley chose to stay and fight. For him, it was a matter of right and wrong and standing up for the more than two centuries of U.S. naval tradition.
MORE NEWS: JD Rucker: A Revolution of Truth
Moseley could have submitted a religious accommodation request as well, since he like many other servicemen objected to the bioweapon death serum injection on religious grounds. But he knew that this strategy was doomed, because the Biden regime decided to implement a blanket denial policy rejecting essentially every religious accommodation request.
Instead, Lt. Moseley tried a different strategy. He simply refused the order as unlawful, and took his case before the Navy’s administrative separation board. Moseley did his homework. He traveled to three separate Navy facilities to demonstrate that the supposedly FDA-approved “vaccines”, Comirnaty and Spikevax, were not available there.
And in a three to nothing ruling earlier this month, that board ruled in Lt. Moseley’s favor. The vaccination order was not a lawful one, and he can remain with the Navy until he retires.
Lt. Moseley’s case doesn’t automatically apply to other cases, and several hundred members of the Navy have already been kicked out, so we don’t want to oversell this victory. But it’s still a very important win, and offers hope to hundreds of other Navy members who are still battling to secure their rights and protect our armed forces from being gutted.
Attorney Thomas Renz has been helping lead the legal fight against vaccine mandates in the military, and he joins us now. Tom, if this ruling came down for Lt Moseley, why wouldn’t it apply across the Navy?
Follow Stew on Gab.
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Red Voice Media. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary. Red Voice Media would like to make a point of clarification on why we do not refer to any shot related to COVID-19 as a "vaccine." According to the CDC, the definition of a vaccine necessitates that said vaccine have a lasting effect of at least one year in preventing the contraction of the virus or disease it's intended to fight. Because all of the COVID-19 shots thus far available have barely offered six months of protection, and even then not absolute, Red Voice Media has made the decision hereafter to no longer refer to the Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson substances as vaccinations.