Although the White House is not willing to talk about the 2020 election and the numerous accusations surrounding the Democrats helping rig the results in Biden’s favor, the new film “2000 Mules” didn’t just accuse the Biden administration of stealing an election, it used cell phone data to show how it was done. Since the results were announced, former President Donald Trump has been adamant that the election was taken away from him and the American people.
While conservatives and Republicans who share this belief are often labeled conspiracy theorists, 2000 Mules debunked that accusation. And while the film has constantly been scrutinized and mocked by the mainstream media, it should be noted that the documentary helped solve a shooting using the same data.
Go Ad-Free, Get Exclusive Shows and Content, Go Premium Today - $1 Trial
Discussing the criticism the film has received, filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza, as can be seen in the video below, admitted that not a single outlet has approached him to discuss the claims. D’Souza used Fox News as an example. He said, “So their idea seems to be not to have the conversation, but to prevent it and to do so by appealing to what are clearly these left wing fact checks on the movie fact checks that are themselves highly dubious. And so talk for a moment, if you will about why you just sort of how they try to block you from getting to this topic and talk about the importance if you will above the movie.”
MORE NEWS: If It Wasn’t For Race Baiters Like Ben Crump & Al Sharpton We Would Have Never Heard Of Jordan Neely [VIDEO]
Welcoming Congressman Mo Brooks to his podcast, the Representative noted, “Well, 2000 Mules brings up a lot of troubling aspects about this last election. Let me go back to the commissioner of federal election reform for a moment, they said that the number one concern with our election system is the mailing out of ballots, because that is where there are weaknesses in the chain of custody with those ballots. We’re never really sure that the registered voter who’s supposed to vote a ballot was the person who has voted that ballot.”
As for the critics attacking the film and the evidence presented, the Republican saw it as nothing more than a targeted strategy. “When you have these mass mail outs of ballots, you don’t have that chain of custody, you don’t have that evidentiary trail and you don’t know. And so when these fact checkers ramble on with their propaganda about 2000 Mules being debunked, in a court of law, they’re debunking would not stand any kind of credibility whatsoever. The proper way to either debunk or confirm what 2000 Mules says is real simple, we need to have investigative agencies around the United States of America, in particular district attorneys and Attorney General’s looking at the data, the information, the facts, the evidence surrounding what is engaged or exposed in 2000 Mules. And then get to the bottom of whether a particular person committed a particular crime on a particular occasion.”
You can see the full segment below…
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
In a democrat led government let’s face it, nothing is going to happen to anyone. D’Souza needs to also do one on the Dominion machines. Maybe with enough evidence piled up IF we get the houses back, the republicans will actually put their money where their mouths are AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
Law enforcement in America? Now that’s hilarious. Law is only enforced on American patriots.
Laws, A civilized way to have rules that all agree to follow. Rules designed to control government and limit their powers. Today the discussion is about gun control. we are watching the demands for stricter laws that limit the ownership of Guns. So the drumbeat for new laws. After all laws that deny ownership of Guns will prevent murders. Sadly that statement isn’t backed up by governments own data. The laws when we look at them are written with vague verbiage that can be interpreted too many ways. What is always clear is that they always expand the powers of government. the reason we control their powers is abuse, with powers comes the temptation to test their limits. Anyone with powers wants more. new laws is the way they get it. laws that seem travail that are classified as misdemeanor seems inconsequential but a third violation becomes a felony. the violation that now removes your ability to purchase a gun. (backdoor gun control) So why such measures to prevent ownership of Guns. The reason that our second amendment is number two behind protecting freedom of speech as number one because of their importance. so why is owning a gun for hunting so important? Hunting isn’t the reason. Defense against government. To protect ourselves. against government abuse of power. we can’t do that if government is the only ones armed. to prove my point. go back as far as you can and compare the numbers of proposed gun control laws to any other you wish and look at the quantity. then look at who sponsors them. basic math and logic shows us who wants power.———–Grampa
Mo Brooks always has a reason to act conservative when it’s necessary.
He is very anti Donald Trump. He would be in good company with McConnell, Graham and the other traitors. They are members of the Uniparty and have nothing but contempt for Americans.
You got that right, my friend!