“Josh Sigurdson rants about the recent court finding that Alex Jones of Infowars must pay the parents of Sandy Hook victims 45 million dollars in settlements over a defamation suit. Regardless of how you feel about Alex Jones personally, it should not matter at all, considering the notion of government stealing your money and re-allocating it and destroying a media enterprise because someone voiced their opinion and others decided to build on that opinion is absolutely an infringement of free speech. Alex Jones, who was banned from talking about free speech in court, was basically left without defense.
On top of that, his lawyer “accidentally” leaked information to the Sandy Hook victim’s parents’ lawyer! Was he wrong about no children dying? Yes. Does that mean he should be destroyed and bankrupted forever? NO! Was Sandy Hook a false flag? Absolutely and we will not let this case be a precedent for us to not talk about the truth. But kids died. The government loves killing kids and brainwashing the masses.
Go Ad-Free, Get Exclusive Shows and Content, Go Premium Today - $1 Trial
Remember, Alex Jones did NOT kill anyone. The government, which found in favor of the parents of the children lost, have killed millions of people. The fact that people are mad at Alex and not the killer or the mass murderers in government is truly a perfect example of the utter stupidity of the masses today.
In this video, we break down the insane story and also report on the insane hoards of people mindlessly supporting the destruction of free speech because their feelings are hurt.” – World Alternative Media
Sources referenced by Josh in the video above:
- Sky News: Alex Jones ordered to pay another $45m to parents of Sandy Hook massacre victim
- Unilad: Jury orders Alex Jones to pay more than $4 million for Sandy Hook hoax claims
- Banned.Video: BREAKING EXCLUSIVE! Alex Jones Responds To $4.2 Million Sandy Hook Verdict
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
He spoke freely. However, Freedom of Speech doesn’t guarantee without consequences if it hurt others. Once cannot falsely shout fire in a theatre only to cause a stampede that hurt or kill others.
Similarly, one cannot falsely claim that the mass-killing of children, teachers & staff at Sandy Hook was a staged or a lie. For that reason, the victims parents & others are left devastated all over again.
Freedom of Speech doesn’t mean to be reckless and irresponsible in behavior. Did he go to the scene and/or talk to the parents & families of the alleged victims before telling the world it was all a sham or hoax?
Now, what if the world ignore & deny the news posting his recent loss of $45+ millions in lawsuits to claim it too is a hoax? Should their behavior be considered Freedom of Speech?