Just a few months ago, the Democrats and liberal activists protested across America as the Supreme Court announced its ruling on Roe v. Wade. While abortion is not illegal in the United States, the ruling allows each individual state to make its own decision on the matter. Again, the Democrats viciously criticized the Supreme Court. Surprisingly, that wasn’t the only controversial ruling made by the Supreme Court in recent months. The Supreme Court also ruled 6-3 that New York’s concealed carry law was unconstitutional when it came to the restriction it puts on law-abiding citizens.
**Let’s Connect! Join Our Community**
According to NPR, “This decision is a big deal. Previously, the court had only said that the Constitution protected the ability to have a gun inside the home for self-defense. In that decision, which came down in 2008, the justices didn’t rule on how guns carried outside the home could be regulated. It took almost 15 years for the justices to come back to that question, but now they have.”
Go Ad-Free, Get Exclusive Shows and Content, Go Premium Today - $1 Trial
Giving his own opinion on the ruling, Supreme Court Judge Clarence Thomas noted, “The Second Amendment “protect[s] an individual’s right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home.”
The main worry about the Second Amendment ruling surrounds Democratic strongholds that may be forced to change their own concealed carry laws. The Western Journal reported, “The Supreme Court said Thursday that gun cases involving restrictions in Hawaii, California, New Jersey, and Maryland deserve a new look following its major decision in a gun case last week. In light of last week’s ruling — which said that Americans have a right to carry a gun outside the home — lower courts should take another look at several cases that had been awaiting action by the high court, the court said. Those cases include ones about high-capacity magazines, an assault weapons ban, and a state law that limits who can carry a gun outside the home.”
Among those who criticized the ruling was Kelly Sampson, who is the director of racial justice at Brady, a gun safety organization. She claimed, “We live in a society that codes Black people in general as criminal but especially when we carry arms. So when you strip away all of the rhetoric around the Second Amendment, you still can’t get away from the fundamental issue that we live in a country where Black people are disproportionately dying from gun homicides, and Black people also are disproportionately impacted by police violence. And one of the rationales that police will use when they perpetuate this violence is that a person had a gun.”
On the other side, Carl Williams, A YouTuber with the channel “A Regular Gun Guy,” wasn’t entirely on board with the ruling but admitted, “If anything, it encouraged me more to want to own a firearm legally and be able to protect myself just in case something happened.”
Beat Big Tech With High-Speed, Secure & Anonymous VPN Service - 30 Day Free Trial
This piece was written by Jeremy Porter on August 16, 2022. It originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission.
Read more at LifeZette:
Kari Lake Set Twitter On Fire With Her ‘BDE’ Comments On Ron DeSantis & Donald Trump [VIDEO]
Trump Attorney Drops A Clue On Fox News About Pelosi’s DUI – Concealed, Undisclosed… Epstein Island [VIDEO]
Rep. Jim Jordan Claims 14 FBI Agents Accused The Agency Of Corruption [VIDEO]
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Red Voice Media. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
This is old news
Agree.
Violent criminals remain unaffected by this Supreme Court ruling. Violent criminals always carried outside of their home, and they will always continue to do so, regardless of the law.
Tru dat.
David Duke Says He and Donald Trump Have the Same Message Former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke is running for Senate in Louisiana, and he says Donald Trump’s popularity is helping him in the race.
“I love it,” Duke told the LA Times. “The fact that Donald Trump’s doing so well, it proves that I’m winning. I am winning.”
Over 90 % of the terrorist actions in the United States has been perpetrated by WHITE MALE CHRISTIANS not some Muslim who is on the other side of the world..Dylann Roof · WHITE MALE CHRISTIAN shot and killed 9 black members of a church in South Carolina , AND he shot them claiming to PROTECT HIS CHRISTIAN RACE,,,,,20-year-old Adam Lanza WHITE MALE CHRISTIAN murdered 26 children at the Sandy Hook Elementary School ALMOST ALL THE SCHOOL SHOOTINGS WAS DONE BY ,,,,,,WHITE MALE CHRISTIAN,,,, and Oklahoma,city bombing. That left 168 people dead and hundreds more injured. By Timothy “McVeigh,and Terry Nichols…. Payton Gendron, the 18-year-old charged with killing 10 people in upstate New York last month, left a handwritten note to his parents apologizing but stating that he “had to commit this attack” because he cared “for the future of the White race.”
you see a good guy with a gun NEVER rushes in to save the day,in fact it is a very RARE EVENT…,, they usually shoot the wrong person or get shot themselves……either by the police or the gunman
REPUBLICANS support KID KILLERS not KIDS..
. VOTE REPUBLICAN SO YOUR CHILDREN CAN BECOME TARGETS AS YOUR GOP LAWLESS LAWMAKERS KEEP THE DIRTY DEATH MONEY FLOWING
Who thinks it is a good idea for MENTALY ILL persons to carry co
Those shooters you cute were certainly not Christian, but certainly were lefties. Just like the blacks who rampage daily in dem cities, who are also lefties.
As to your lies that good guys don’t stop bad guys, even the FBI will disagree with that. Check out Lott’s works based on FBI data.
I really WISH that individuals such as yourself could just get YOUR FACTS straight and stop listening to bullshit information via BLUE headlines. ONE of the so-called facts you hobbled together was true as written–the perps were white. That’s it.
Let’s knock that up against the criminal activity stats of each race in the USA and see how the count goes. Hmmmmm? You’re a headline person spewing crap, not a critical thinker interested in facts. However, you and all your buddies are VERY much interested in forwarding your personal agenda and whatever benefits your fearful worldview can conjure, as are all of the non-critical thinkers who refuse to research or even listen to facts if they are not told by an authority. If you read info off a NWO Narrative site via the so-called fact checkers who do NOT check facts, who do NOT report facts and who do NOT allow facts to sully the current kill-shot, Frankenfood, gun control, “you’ll have nothing and be happy” NWO narrative then you are solid in the Woketard category right now.
The only fact you have written but, clearly didn’t know you were, is that the current environment of death, starvation and destruction currently being forwarded by your good buddies who are promoting strife among humanity worldwide ARE WHITE MEN and WHITE WOMEN of the UN/WEF/WHO alongside the usual suspects and their politico, alphabet agency and bureaucratic toadies. The DEATH TOLL IS IN THE MILLIONS WORLDWIDE, DUMBASS. Injuries as well.
So, bugger off until you WAKE UP! If you do awaken with that ‘ah-ha’ moment and realize how stupid you’ve been, as do many of us when we awaken, come back. You’ll have a chance to learn what it means to be part of an adult conversation.
Owning a gun IS NOT A RIGHT guaranteed by the second amendment, FORMING A MILITA IS if you are not in a chartered militia YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO OWN A GUN…..and if your MILITA needs guns you can have all the cannons or anti aircraft guns you would like to have….
THE 2ND AMENDMENT…..
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
“
. The real purpose of the Second Amendment was to ensure that state armies – the militia – would be maintained for the defense of the state. The very language of the Second Amendment refutes any argument that it was intended to guarantee every citizen an unfettered right to any kind of weapon he or she desires. – Warren Burger, Conservative Supreme Court Chief Justice
A well regulated militia is “the citizenry!” National Guard is NOT militia! Plus! ,the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed! “Keep” meaning in your home! “Bear” meaning on your person! Warren Berger was a Communist, and I believe, so are you!
???” A well regulated militia is “the citizenry!” National Guard is NOT militia! ??? WTF ?
WHAT YOU CLAIM your rights are being infringed ????? HOW tell us all about it…can you?
“I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials.”—George Mason
“The Second Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances where all other rights have failed – where the government refuses to stand for reelection and silences those who protest; where courts have lost the courage to oppose, or can find no one to enforce their decrees. However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once.”—Alex Kozinski
“The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting, and I know I’m not going to make very many friends saying this, but it’s about our right, all of our right to be able to protect ourselves from all of you guys [politicians] up there.”—Suzanna Hupp
“One of the ordinary modes, by which tyrants accomplish their purposes without resistance, is, by disarming the people, and making it an offense to keep arms.”—Joseph Story
The second amendment was never about hunting, target practice, etc. The main reason for the second amendment is to protect ourselves, whether it be from criminals or…a power-mad, runaway government.
I agree 100%. Anyone who has taken a deep dive into the history and causes of the Revolutionary War knows that our forefathers were writing into the Constitution protective rights against the usurpation of power by a tyrannical government.
They put in all the known causes…and left it to the states and the people…or the ability to amend the Constitution…to deal with situations that had yet to be addressed in the future.
You will also notice that the term is to bear “arms”…not just guns. Indeed if pushed to the limit…the people are given the right to defend themselves and their country by the means they determine are necessary. For the most part, we are a peaceful people. But, our forefathers have given us a road map of what to do against tyranny.
You named the puppy. Governments are NEVER to be trusted’ they must be watched like a hawk.
Our ancestors had to deal with tyrants, tyrants, tyrants, always tyrants–in comes the UN/WEF/WHO, et al–tyrants. Americans were given the 2nd Amendment to prevent future generations from being unable to fight off tyranny on US soil. The Forefathers wanted to secure their future FREEDOM. Without a level playing field force is a one-way street. Take a look at other countries.
Reread the 2A—the Right of the _____. Go ahead, fill in the blank.
Burger was wrong, just like many individual Justices as well as rulings before him. Or do you not understand the significance of Brown v Board of Education—it didn’t overturn and reverse a school board decision but a….what…yep, a SCOTUS decision (meaning the majority of Justices had signed on to what was overturned).
Your ignorance can be fixed. Read the writings of the Founders who had just won a Revolution fought with private weapons held in the hands of citizens.
Your OPINON has been duly noted and properly filled, get back to me when you have FACTS if you know of any some people can build a philosophy from STUPIDITY…
Name calling does NOT make you right. Do as Retired SOF Guy suggested and read up on the history and causes of the Revolutionary War. I have had to research it in depth for a book I am writing…and I am well versed in the issue. Also Miffed52 has a very good grasp of our forefathers’ intentions.
I would be happy to make corrections to anything you can point out that is not true,,, SO GO Ahead ,tell us what you dont know…I am always looking for updates whacha got more hot air ?.
Get back to us when you are an adult who can research properly. Retire SOF Guy is correct.
I would be happy to make corrections to anything you can point out that is not true,,, SO GO Ahead ,tell us what you dont know…I am always looking for updates whacha got more hot air ?.
THE 2ND AMENDMENT…..
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Guns that do not belong on the streets need to come off the streets “sawed off shotguns” ,, guns with tampered serial numbers,,,fully automatic weapons,,,a shotgun without a” shell limiter “while hunting, are ALL examples of an ILEGAL WEAPON,, have been that way for some time…outlawing
outlawing certain weapons is common sense ,,,,,,unless you are a convicted felon,,under age or mentally ill ,,, NO ONE IS COMING FOR YOUR,,GUNS…
YOU cant have an AR15 FOR THE SAME REASON YOU CANT HAVE A SAWED OFF SHOTGUN…
The AR-15 has always been an assault weapon. A weapon of offense. Deal with it.
In September 1963, the .223 Remington cartridge was officially accepted and named “Cartridge, 5.56 mm ball, M193”. The following year, the ArmaLite AR-15 was adopted by the United States Army as the M16 rifle and it would later become the standard U.S. military rifle. The specification included a Remington-designed bullet and the use of IMR4475 powder, which resulted in a muzzle velocity of 3,250 ft/s and a chamber pressure of 52,000 psi.
In the spring of 1962, Remington submitted the specifications of the .223 Remington to the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute (SAAMI). In December 1963, Remington introduced its first rifle chambered for .223 Remington a Model 760 rifle.
H/T Colette M.
You are one confused lib…
Your OPINON has been duly noted and properly filled, get back to me when you have FACTS if you know of any some people can build a philosophy from STUPIDITY…
The real purpose of the Second Amendment was to ensure that state armies – the militia – would be maintained for the defense of the state. The very language of the Second Amendment refutes any argument that it was intended to guarantee every citizen an unfettered right to any kind of weapon he or she desires. – Warren Burger, Conservative Supreme Court Chief Justice
“This is not about protecting the Second Amendment. This is about gun manufacturers making millions and millions and millions of dollars. This is about retailers making millions and millions and millions of dollars. According to data compiled of school shootings in the last 18 months, 75% of the guns used were purchased legally. In looking back over the past 30 years, assault weapons and/or high capacity magazines have been used in more than 50% of the mass shootings taking place within this time period
The only purpose of assault weapons is killing human beings quickly and in large numbers.,,It’s simple: assault rifles are often the weapon of choice for nut cases and mass murderers, so remove them from the legal gun trade.” • NO ONE hunts rabbits with a A K 47 and no one defends their home with a rocket grenade launcher,, guns that do not belong on the streets need to come off the streets “sawed off shotguns” ,, guns with tampered serial numbers,,,fully automatic weapons,,,a shotgun without a” shell limiter “while hunting, are ALL examples of an ILEGAL WEAPON,, have been that way for some time…outlawing certain weapons is NOTHING NEW,,,,,,unless you are a convicted felon,,under age or mentally ill ,,, NO ONE IS COMING FOR YOUR,,GUNS…
Our forefathers were AGAINST standing armies…because they thought they could be turned against the people. During the Rev.War they had to fight against such armies. In spite of that, we have had a standing army since WWII.
How is it that you absolutely know weapons manufacturers are securing their profits by using lobbies (very true–good work), but you don’t know or refuse to look at the real weaponized tools of the UN/WEF/WHO/Pfizer/Moderna. Their kill-shot push, and the 24/7 worldwide propaganda campaign is all about securing every possible profit and all resources through a murderous agenda they expect to result in the take-over and destruction of the US economy/government as well as the world’s economy–FOR THEMSELVES.
Profits for Pfizer were posted in the 100’s of billions of dollars. That’s what 2.5 years of murder with a weaponized, lab altered virus will earn you if you are “a man of wealth and taste” (Rolling Stones, Sympathy for the Devil) Check it out, Myopic. (And no. I’m not going to help you by listing a link. You deserve to research it yourself.) Maybe you’ll see why the 2nd Amendment IS.
Define ‘assault weapon’…other than being a ‘scary looking’ firearm.
The .223 and the 5.56 x 45mm are two distinct cartridges. While both are very similar, the .223 can be fired in a firearm chambered for 5.56, the 5.56 should not be regularly fired in a firearm designated for .223 due to higher pressures generated by the 5.56 cartridge.
Your reasoning on what is legal and illegal is faulty. A sawed-off shotgun is illegal, but an AR-15 is not illegal just as an example.
“If gun laws in fact worked, the sponsors of this type of legislation should have no difficulty drawing upon long lists of examples of criminal acts reduced by such legislation. That they cannot do so after a century and a half of trying – that they must sweep under the rug the southern attempts at gun control in the 1870-1910 period, the northeastern attempts in the 1920-1939 period, the attempts at both Federal and State levels in 1965-1976 – establishes the repeated, complete and inevitable failure of gun laws to control serious crime.”—Orrin Hatch
Gun laws have never reduced or eliminated violent crimes committed with a firearm.
The thing that has changed is people. When I was in high school, just about every boy had a firearm that he brought to school during hunting season. The ranged from .22 to 30/06, including shotguns…semi-auto as-well-as bolt action for the rifles and single shot thru semi-auto for the shotguns, but most were pump action. They were kept in their locker or in their car/truck along with the ammunition. We never had any problems with people going around shooting other people. People have changed. Guns do not kill people…it is the person who pulls the trigger that kills.
“A sword never kills anybody; it is a tool in the killer’s hand.”— Lucius Annaeus Seneca, c. 4BC – 65AD
Just like a sword…a firearm is only a tool. It can be as good or as bad as the person holding it, but it has no power on its own.
YOU ARE CORRECT HERE ARE TWO OF THEM… WE HAD A BAN PLACED BY CLINTON AND BUSH ALLOWED IT TO EXPIRE….
Federal Assault Weapons Ban and shootings with this type of weapon dropped 37%
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Federal Assault Weapons Ban (AWB)—
ASK AUSTRALIA,They banned SOME of their guns and ,, their murder rate dropped 50% and their suicide rate dropped 60%
They want people to BLAME COPS not the GUN..
NO CIVILIAN needs An A R 15 the rounds will ZIP right through a policeman’s bullet proof vest like it wasn’t even there,,,,Police are OUTGUNNED all the time all over the country THERE IS NO WAY TO JUSTIFY THIS…..
Uvalde: AR-15
Buffalo: AR-15′
Boulder: AR-15
Orlando: AR-15
Parkland: AR-15
Las Vegas: AR-15
Aurora, CO: AR-15
Sandy Hook: AR-15
Waffle House: AR-15
San Bernardino: AR-15
Midland/Odessa: AR-15
Poway synagogue: AR-15
Sutherland Springs: AR-15
Tree of Life Synagogue: AR-15
DON’T FALL FOR IT
Yeah…and now Austrians are suffering an overbearing government because of it. They get locked down, arrested, put into camps, etc. First, they were disarmed…and now they cannot fight back.
NAME THAT LAW LIAR..tell us all about it
SNOPES Australian Gun Stats
Statistics do not demonstrate that crime rates in Australia have increased substantially since the government instituted a gun buy-back program in 1997.
Report Advertisement
CLAIM
Statistics demonstrate that crime rates in Australia have increased substantially since the government there instituted a gun buy-back program in 1997.
RATING
FALSE
ORIGIN
During the 1990s, Australia was confronting a problem similar to the one that regularly confronts Americans: shooting incidents over the previous decade had left more than a hundred people dead, including the infamous Port Arthur massacre in April 1996 that saw one gunman wielding a semi-automatic rifle kill 35 people over the course of a single day (including 20 people with 29 bullets in about 90 seconds):
Snopes? You ARE insane and a big crap disbursal mechanism. They are the fact-checkers’ fact checker for the Narrative, specifically. They work for the really, really bad guys, stupid. The ones you work for. OH! was that a secret?
YOU cant have an AR15 FOR THE SAME REASON YOU CANT HAVE A SAWED OFF SHOTGUN…
The AR-15 has always been an assault weapon. A weapon of offense. Deal with it.
In September 1963, the .223 Remington cartridge was officially accepted and named “Cartridge, 5.56 mm ball, M193”. The following year, the ArmaLite AR-15 was adopted by the United States Army as the M16 rifle and it would later become the standard U.S. military rifle. The specification included a Remington-designed bullet and the use of IMR4475 powder, which resulted in a muzzle velocity of 3,250 ft/s and a chamber pressure of 52,000 psi.
In the spring of 1962, Remington submitted the specifications of the .223 Remington to the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute (SAAMI). In December 1963, Remington introduced its first rifle chambered for .223 Remington a Model 760 rifle.
H/T Colette M.
I wonder what happens when a Black individual shoots a cop claiming he feared for his life, especially if he’d been treated harshly in the past by officers. Does this open a whole other avenue of approach to “civil rights”?
I don’t think America has a race problem. It has a problem race.
David Duke Says He and Donald Trump Have the Same Message Former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke is running for Senate in Louisiana, and he says Donald Trump’s popularity is helping him in the race.
“I love it,” Duke told the LA Times. “The fact that Donald Trump’s doing so well, it proves that I’m winning. I am winning.”
Over 90 % of the terrorist actions in the United States has been perpetrated by WHITE MALE CHRISTIANS not some Muslim who is on the other side of the world..Dylann Roof · WHITE MALE CHRISTIAN shot and killed 9 black members of a church in South Carolina , AND he shot them claiming to PROTECT HIS CHRISTIAN RACE,,,,,20-year-old Adam Lanza WHITE MALE CHRISTIAN murdered 26 children at the Sandy Hook Elementary School ALMOST ALL THE SCHOOL SHOOTINGS WAS DONE BY ,,,,,,WHITE MALE CHRISTIAN,,,, and Oklahoma,city bombing. That left 168 people dead and hundreds more injured. By Timothy “McVeigh,and Terry Nichols…. Payton
Just because DAVID DUKE said something doesn’t makes it true. Trump has disavowed racism so many times…and the mainstream media keeps cutting it out of the videos. And also his actions in helping the black community shows he is not a racist. You are being so misled by the propaganda passing for news. I am glad to see you here at Red Voice Media…you might learn something. You have to be discerning…even here…but thus far they have been surprisingly correct in stories that make you do a double take.
Your OPINON has been duly noted and properly filled, get back to me when you have FACTS if you know of any some people can build a philosophy from STUPIDITY…
Just wondering, are you a fanatic of some kind, or are you on Soros’s payroll? You purport to be some kind of expert, who knows more then the S.C. Justices and you post the same things over and over again.
I would be happy to make corrections to anything you can point out that is not true,,, SO GO Ahead ,tell us what you dont know…I am always looking for updates whacha got more hot air ?.
YOU could look it up like i did or you may remain ignorant as long as you wish
This decision (the same as with Heller) is not near the good news many Christians and patriots think it is:
“…Because this is a “right” codified by the United States Constitutional Republic and thereby brought under its jurisdiction, the Constitutional Republic can divest its citizens of this right – something it has been doing incrementally for some time. On June 26, 2008, in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S., the Supreme Court decided, five to four, that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to own and bear firearms. Although gun owners hailed Heller a victory, this battle (which is far from over) concerning the constitutional right to bear arms has diverted our attention from the larger and more consequential battle.
“Disconcerting as many Americans may find the erosion of the Second Amendment guarantee, what is even more disturbing is that five people have the power to decide whether United States citizens have the right to protect themselves and their families, to what degree, and with what weapons. The Supreme Court has ruled that Americans have the right to bear arms, but only until they say otherwise. Many Americans who celebrated Heller overlooked the fact that it can – and likely will – be overturned by a future court, just as its decision overturned United States v. Miller, s307 U.S. 174, rendered in 1939. If you look to the Second Amendment for your authority to bear arms, that authority is contingent upon the fickle nature of nine fallible human beings….”
For more, see Chapter 12 “Amendment 2: Constitutional vs. Biblical Self-Defense” of free online book “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective” at Bible versus Constitution dot org. Click on the top entry on our Online Book page and scroll down to Chapter 12.
Also , listen to “The Second Amendment: A Knife in a Gunfight,” delivered at the Springfield, Missouri Firearms and Freedom Symposium. Go to our Video page and scroll down to title.
The Bill of Rights was a codification of existing (God-given) rights, not rights granted to the people by their government. The globalist-liberal cultists would treat the person yelling “fire” in a crowded theater worse than the person who set the fire (just as long as it was crowded with people whose views they despised) so the “you can’t yell ‘fire’ in a crowded theater” and “you’re rights are not absolute” mob, should take their complaints to the grantor of those rights, Almighty God, and pray they are not incinerated for their insolence!
Excellent. Intelligent. CORRECT. Thanks for commenting.
Did you dipshits just call Brady a “gun safety” organization? That’s like saying the Nazis were a “Jewish safety” organization.
VOTE REPUBLICAN SO YOUR CHILDREN CAN BECOME TARGETS AS YOUR GOP LAWLESS LAWMAKERS KEEP THE DIRTY DEATH MONEY FLOWING
Who thinks it is a good idea for MENTALY ILL persons to carry concealed weapons?
President Donald Trump quietly signed a bill into law Tuesday rolling back an Obama-era regulation that made it harder for people with mental illnesses to purchase a gun. President Barack Obama recommended the now-nullified regulation in a 2013 memo following the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School, which left 20 first graders and six others dead. The measure sought to block some people with severe mental ek passed the new bill, H.J. Res 40, revoking the Obama-era regulation.
Your post was put up an hour ago. How can President Trump quietly sign a bill into law Tuesday when he is no longer in office? Moreover, we have had a LOT of mass shootings in recent years that is out of the norm historically. You can believe it or not…but I believe there is more to those shootings than we know. The government has in the past used programmed people in MK Ultra, used heart attack guns, tested LSD on unwitting soldiers, tested syphilis on black people, etc. Do you think they would NOT engage in false flag mass murder to convince people to give up their guns…when they have mandated an experimental drug that they know has killed and maimed thousands of people…against a disease that was created in a lab…and is 99.9% survivable? Adding 2 + 2 comes up with a pretty nasty 4.
I’m beginning to think you are mentally ill.
No thinking needed.
Just another panicked Leftist…with a case of TDS.
Click bait title nothing new here.
AFAIK, blacks are killed by other blacks 89% of the time. Police are getting way too much blame thanks to our fake news talking heads.