Pharma is at the end game of its sinister plans in an attempt to get the COVID jab recommended on the childhood vaccine schedule.

Now, why is this move so critical for them? Robert. F. Kennedy, Jr. explains:

Go Ad-Free, Get Exclusive Shows and Content, Go Premium Today - $1 Trial

If you want to know why [there is] such a strong, fierce drive to vaccinate children, you have to understand how the law works. Under the CARES Act and the PREP Act, emergency use authorization vaccines are protected from liability. So as long as it’s an EUA vaccine, you can’t sue them, no matter how reckless their conduct, no matter how grievous your injury, no matter how negligent they are, you cannot sue them.

Once it becomes an approved vaccine, that shield – that freedom from immunity disappears, and we will be able to sue them — unless it’s a recommended vaccine for children. Because under the childhood vaccine act, any vaccine that is recommended for children automatically receives immunity from liability even when that vaccine is given to an adult.

So Pfizer knows that it cannot afford to give an approved vaccine to any American because attorneys like me will sue them and bankrupt them overnight. We will make them pay for the entire pandemic. But if they can get it approved for children, then they’ll get immunity from liability, and they will not have to deal with the consequences of their behavior.

And if these COVID shots end up on the official vaccination schedule for childhood, children will be REQUIRED to take experimental gene therapy shots as a condition for attending school — of which 80 to 90% are already naturally immune to COVID.

Here’s what you can do:

The CDC is slated to have another meeting on the childhood vaccine regimen on October 20, 2022, from 8:30 am to 3:20 pm EDT.

1.) Watch the meeting:

Follow Us On Rumble

2.) Leave a public comment (you can do so from now until October 20):

3.) Share this article/links with aligned friends and family to multiply the pest army further to thwart their goals.

And text is scary, but voices are scarier.

If The Election Was Today, Who Would Get Your Vote? - Donald Trump or Ron DeSantis?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from Red Voice Media, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

Give the ACIP Committee members listed below (especially Dr. Long) a phone call. Stay civil but firm, and cite the science if you feel qualified to do so. But let your heart speak, as it is important for them to grasp the scale of awakened citizens and the backlash that will ensue should they vote on behalf of pharma interests.

You can call and/or leave a message at any time.

• Dr. Sarah Long 215-427-5201

• Dr. Grace Lee 650-497-0618

• Lynn Bahta (an RN) 651-201-5505

• Dr. Beth Bell  404-432-3059

• Dr. Oliver Brooks 323-564-4331

• Dr. Wilbur Chen 410-706-5328

• Dr. Sybil Cineas 401-444-4741

• Dr. Helen Keipp Talbot 615-322-2035

• Dr. Matthew Daley 303-393-6604

• Dr. Camille Nelson Kotton 617-726-3812

• Dr. Jamie Loehr 607-697-0360

• Veronica V. McNally (an attorney) 517-432-6969

• Dr. Katherine A. Poehling 336-716-9661 extension: 62540

• Dr. Pablo J. Sánchez 614-722-4559

• Dr. Nirav D. Shah 312-952-6092

Thanks for Reading.

If you’d like to ditch the ads, support the author (Vigilant Fox), and gain access to exclusive content, try out RVM Premium for just $1.

Follow Us On Twitter

Red Voice Media would like to make a point of clarification on why we do not refer to any shot related to COVID-19 as a "vaccine." According to the CDC, the definition of a vaccine necessitates that said vaccine have a lasting effect of at least one year in preventing the contraction of the virus or disease it's intended to fight. Because all of the COVID-19 shots thus far available have barely offered six months of protection, and even then not absolute, Red Voice Media has made the decision hereafter to no longer refer to the Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson substances as vaccinations.