Seventy-five years. That’s how long Pfizer and the FDA tried to hide the Pfizer documents from public view — long after just about everyone affected is dead. It wasn’t until renowned attorney Aaron Siri led a FOIA case against the FDA that a federal judge ordered the documents to be released in 108 days, the same amount of time it took the FDA to approve the Covid-19 injections.

So what exactly is within those documents? What is there to uncover that Pfizer and the FDA didn’t want available for public view?

Go Ad-Free, Get Exclusive Shows and Content, Go Premium Today - $1 Trial

Thanks to the thousands of highly-credentialed and brave War Room/DailyClout volunteers, much of the heavy lifting has already been done. Let’s take a closer look at three of the – now – fifty Pfizer reports that Pfizer and the FDA don’t want you to see:

Report 11: Pfizer Vaccine – FDA Fails to Mention Risk of Heart Damage in Teens (April 7, 2022)

By Dr. Chris Flowers

Evidence suggests that the FDA and Pfizer must have known that the mRNA injections were causing myocarditis in teens when they granted emergency use authorization for adolescents in May 2021 because a peer-reviewed article floating around the time acknowledged the risks of myocarditis post-inoculation.

This initial report established the serious problem of myopericarditis in adolescents following mRNA inoculation was published in June 2021.

Get Ready for Anything: Introducing the Medical Emergency Kit for Any Crisis

• June 2021 was one month AFTER the FDA received the priority review for EUA for 12 to 15-year-olds to receive the mRNA vaccine.

This raises the question about what the FDA knew about myocarditis and when they knew it — because this paper would have been peer-reviewed some months before it was published. Thus, the findings of heart damage in teenagers would have been available to the FDA at the time when it granted EUA for the Pfizer injection.

If The 2024 Election Came Down To Ron DeSantis And Robert F. Kennedy Jr. | Who Would You Be Voting For?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from Red Voice Media, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

However, the Emergency Use Authorization itself in May 2021 did NOT mention any risk of myocarditis in adolescents. It wasn’t until August — after hundreds of thousands of 12 to 15-year-olds were injected — that the FDA finally disclosed to the general public the legitimate concerns of myocarditis in this age group.

Then in March 2022, the myocarditis signal was affirmed when a study found 35 cases of myocarditis in children within one week after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer mRNA injection.

Thus, as Dr. Chris Flowers writes, “Due to the lack of disclosure by the FDA of the known harms, the parents who chose to have their teenagers vaccinated with mRNA vaccines, therefore, could not have made use of fully informed consent.”

Report 37: Pfizer, FDA, CDC Hid Proven Harms to Male Sperm Quality, Testes Function, from mRNA Vaccine Ingredients (August 16, 2022)

By Amy Kelly

Amy Kelly, Program Director for the War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Project, dropped an array of astonishing findings within this report:

1. mRNA vaccine ingredients can be transferred from one person to another via skin-to-skin contact, inhalation, and “sexual intercourse” through bodily fluids.

2. Pfizer did not test “male reproductive toxicity.”

3. Pfizer also did not test for adverse effects from vaccinated men’s semen — on the development of their offspring.

4. mRNA vaccine ingredients travel throughout the body and gather in organs, including in the testes.

5.) mRNA vaccines resulting in “anti-sperm antibodies” – that is to say, antibodies that treat sperm as an “invader” and damage or kill it – is a known adverse event related to this form of vaccination.

6.) mRNA vaccines cause a staggering drop in semen concentration and total motile count.

7.) By suppressing the discussion of this information, public health agencies, medical professionals, and governments globally denied and continue to deny men true informed consent.

The discoveries within this report were so cataclysmic — that DailyClout CEO Dr. Naomi Wolf accused Pfizer of “targeting masculinity itself.” Here’s what she had to say on Steve Bannon’s War Room shortly after the U.K. suspended the C19 injection for boys twelve and under:

“These injections hurt the testes and hurt the parts of the testes that develop the masculinity, the secondary sex characteristics of little boys and baby boys and teenage boys. So they literally harm the chances of your little boy to grow up normally as a male human adult.

So it’s not just the suppression of the sperm count and the sperm motility, which Andrology Journal reported, which we knew. It’s something even more insidious that the lipid nanoparticles especially, which pass every membrane in the human body, pass into the testes and inflame the epididymis and affect the cells that go to secondary sex characteristics — actual human masculinity.

So it’s literally an experiment on the gender development of little boys. So this has gone viral, and I can’t say there’s a cause and effect, but that’s a pretty tough thing to prove, and we proved it. And suddenly, Britain is saying, ‘Well, maybe we won’t inject the little boys and harm their testes.’”

Report 50: 20% of Post-Jab Strokes Fatal in the 90 Days Following Pfizer COVID mRNA Vaccine Rollout (December 26, 2022)

By War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Project Post-Marketing Team

In Pfizer document 5.3.6 (post-marketing experience first 90 days after mRNA rollout), it was found that 275 people suffered a stroke (interrupted or reduced blood supply to the brain) suspected to be attributed to the vaccine between days 1 to 41; 50% of these occurred within the first 48 hours after injection.

All 300 stroke adverse event reports affecting 275 different patients within Pfizer Document 5.3.6 were classified as “serious.” One in five (61 of the 300) strokes was fatal, 32% did not resolve, 28% had an “unknown” outcome, and three suffered very rare deep brain clots (cerebral venous sinus thrombosis).

It’s important to note that strokes are a medical emergency. And prompt treatment is crucial. “Many stroke survivors experience paralysis on one side of the body or inability to move a specific part of the body.” And “Some stroke survivors may experience trouble using or understanding language (aphasia) or have trouble swallowing liquids or foods (dysphagia).”—

Image Credit:

As stated before, 61 of the 275 people affected died. And what was Pfizer’s conclusion? “This cumulative case review does not raise new safety issues.”

While 61 families were grieving the death of their loved ones and the other 214 were seeking care for their family members post-stroke, Pfizer was too busy with their marketing campaign. “Safe and effective.” They failed to address the strokes, considered them to “not raise new safety issues,” and continued pushing the Covid-19 injections.

And that’s just the tip of the iceberg…

There are 47 other damning reports — just like these ones — using primary source Pfizer documents released under court order by the U.S. FDA. And no one to date has challenged the accuracy of what these reports reveal.

These important summaries, which detail astonishing ranges of deaths, disabilities, and other systematic harms to subjects — damage that both Pfizer and the FDA sought to keep hidden from the public for 75 years — contain vastly important headlines: twenty forms of menstrual damage to women — how Pfizer covered up a flood of adverse events — mRNA and PEG in breast milk — within a month of rollout, Pfizer knew the mRNA vaccines did not work.

Now, for the first time, the 2022 Pfizer Reports are available — and made easily available to you and your loved ones in ebook format. All funds and proceeds raised go to the research project — and put food on the table for those devoting their time to this noble cause. So, please, show your support and get your hands on this critical information in one place — by ordering your copy today.

Pick Up Your Copy

Thanks for Reading. If you’d like to ditch the ads, support the author (Vigilant Fox), and gain access to exclusive content, try out RVM Premium for just $1.

Pro-God. Pro-America. A children’s book club you can trust!

Red Voice Media would like to make a point of clarification on why we do not refer to any shot related to COVID-19 as a "vaccine." According to the CDC, the definition of a vaccine necessitates that said vaccine have a lasting effect of at least one year in preventing the contraction of the virus or disease it's intended to fight. Because all of the COVID-19 shots thus far available have barely offered six months of protection, and even then not absolute, Red Voice Media has made the decision hereafter to no longer refer to the Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson substances as vaccinations.