January 9, 2023, marked the day that Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-FL introduced a nefarious bill entitled “Leading Against White Supremacy Act of 2023.” The bill bears a remarkable resemblance to another bill introduced by then-Senator Kamala Harris, D-CA, in 2018 in the sense that it was an anti-lynching bill introduced relative to the fraudulent and dangerous “systemic racism” narrative.
Within Harris’ anti-lynching bill, I identified the vector to introduce slavery reparations, which is now a topic at the forefront of the geopolitical landscape. I extrapolated the evidence in the bill to establish the position that Kamala Harris is going to march us right back to the pre-Civil Rights era. That article can be read here. These extracts are from it:
Go Ad-Free, Get Exclusive Shows and Content, Go Premium Today - $1 Trial
Back in February 2019, I analyzed the Emmett Till Antilynching Act of 2022 in bill form before it was signed into law by President Joe Biden in March 2022. I wanted to examine the need for such a bill in modern times, thinking that it may contain ulterior motives like the discovered introduction of slavery reparations.
Historically, lynching was carried out by Southern Democrats overlapping the Ku Klux Klan and mostly occurring between the 1890s-1920s, although it continued at a lesser rate through the 1950s. The last lynching occurred largely as an anomaly in 1981.
In short, anyone with a modicum of common sense and a basic understanding of factual U.S. history knows that despite what the media may want people to believe [for example, see this, this, and this], lynching is not a modern-day problem in America. So then, why do they continue to pick this scab, and why did Harris introduce an anti-lynching bill signed by Biden just last year?
The short answer is that it applies to an entirely constructed narrative resting on the evidenced components for a plan to target Trump’s base, as I evidence below. Like they’ve turned science on its head, claiming now that men menstruate, they’re turning history on its head since Democrats are the party of racism, slavery, and lynching while Trump’s conservative, the Republican base is the opposite.
Stop Buying From Companies That Hate You, Make The Spending Switch
Resting on the examination of the anti-lynching bill back in February 2019 to establish the position that Harris would march us back to the pre-Civil Rights era, including the introduction of slavery reparations, just look around you. Furthermore, consider it all through the lens of the post-George Floyd riots that I just happened to accurately project nearly three weeks in advance sans the context, noting they broke out on 29 May 20.
Here are recent headlines relative to the slavery reparations that Harris’s bill introduced, a manufactured and fraudulent “systemic racism” narrative, and actual racism the Biden Administration is now actively engaged in drawing a distinct line between blacks and whites as it seeks to redistribute the nation’s collective tax base along racial lines that excludes those who are not black:
- What can reparations for slavery look like in the United States? One man has ideas
- The fight for reparations has stalled in Congress. Here’s what they look like in state and local governments
- San Fran’s reparations committee proposes $5 million to each Black longtime resident, total debt forgiveness
- NY lawmakers push for slavery reparations for black residents
- California Reparations Spark Concern Over White People Possibly Qualifying
- San Francisco plan to give $5 million to black residents in reparations slammed as ‘racist’
Framing the Bill
To examine Rep. Jackson Lee’s “white supremacy” bill, the contextual backdrop is critical to understand. That context is found in the entire series The Hunt Is On and is predicated on the following thoroughly evidenced fact set in part extracted from an article in the series: Revisiting the Capitol “Insurrection” Event in Light of New Evidence to Galvanize it as an Entrapment Operation:
There is an ongoing effort throughout the DOJ/FBI to leverage “domestic terrorists”/”domestic terrorism” as a legal vector to trigger legal authority to target profiled individuals and groups comprised of Trump’s people and the silent majority.
The “domestic terrorists”/”domestic terrorism” angles are further tied to fraudulently propagated “systemic racism” and “white nationalism,” which ties further to then-Senator Kamala Harris-D, CA and her earlier legislative effort to provide the precedence for passing legislation to federally fund slavery reparations. All to give the bite more teeth and to create important linkage.
President Trump is their bridge between “white nationalism” and “domestic terrorism”/”domestic terrorists”, which further bridges to his voter base that also primarily encompasses the silent majority. As such, it permits the FBI/DOJ to target those groups.The “domestic terrorists”/”domestic terrorism” vectors as legal definitions will be justified in their application writ large by the indictment and possible arrest of Trump. Technically, it would trigger the authority to target individuals and groups further caught-up by the constructed bridges connecting to “white nationalism,” which are further extended to target and eviscerate the Second Amendment. It will occur by disarming of the same silent majority; especially of the type of weapon that would be sufficient for militia duty like the AR-15. – Political Moonshine
Here’s further elaboration just to be clear and as sourced from another article in this series: There’s A Tale Being Woven for Telling Once They’ve Rewritten History From the Ashes. Do You Know What It Is?:
Gun control/confiscation, white nationalism and domestic terrorist/terrorism are three separate strands from which an entire net is being sewn to be cast around the infiltrators political enemies. Once fully cast, they’ll cinch it up. It’s a literal scheme to frame good people as the scourge of the earth and use that to render them helpless via disarming them.
For the purpose of assigning false culpability, it will all be tied back and to attributed to President Trump, Ultra MAGA and the silent majority. The only remaining question is will the silent majority actually come to understand this and then rise to do something about it? Right now, that mostly passive majority is on a horrible losing streak and apparently helpless to help itself as all of America’s agencies, departments and institutions have been bent back against it.
In short, the application of the “domestic terrorist/terrorism” label invokes emergency authority and unilateral police powers that circumvent regular constitutional governance. Sound familiar? It should. The majority of the enterprise fraud in COVID-19 occurred during the unilateral emergency determinations processes that produce such things as public health emergency declarations and pandemic declarations. Those declarations provide extraconstitutional governance well exceeding firm boundaries and thus equating to tyranny. – Political Moonshine
Fraudulent “Systemic Racism”
Our first order of business is putting to rest the manufactured, fraudulent, reckless, and dangerous narrative that the U.S. is systemically racist. First, consider these old Moonshine graphics:
Now consider this video from Bill Whittle discussing the same:
The Bill: “Leading Against White Supremacy Act of 2023”
Our second order of business is examining how Jackson Lee’s bill represents a circle-back to the construct being leveraged to target Trump’s supporters, who represent an illegitimate and communist regime’s political opposition, just as communists historically do. Here’s the full text:
In an examination of the bill, we note the following [emphasis added]:
- “A BILL To prevent and prosecute white supremacy inspired hate crime and conspiracy to commit white supremacy inspired hate crime and to amend title 18, United States Code, to expand the scope of hate crimes.” – The bill is augmenting existing U.S. code to codify and make it criminal to commit or conspire to commit crimes already illegal but based upon ideology, thus making the ideology illegal and prosecutable. Although actual racism is reprehensible, making it criminal to conspire to think about it is highly dangerous.
- “IN GENERAL.—A person engages in a white supremacy-inspired hate crime when white supremacy ideology has motivated the planning, development, preparation, or perpetration of actions that constituted a crime or were undertaken in furtherance of activity that, if effectuated, would have constituted a crime.” – Here, the bill makes the commission of a “white supremacy inspired hate crime” arbitrary and capricious by the language “if effectuated.” This would give politically motivated prosecutors a long and lax leash to target individuals based on their ideology and thoughts, not their actions.
- “SEC. 2. WHITE SUPREMACY-INSPIRED HATE CRIME. (a) IN GENERAL.—A person engages in a white supremacy-inspired hate crime when white supremacy ideology has motivated the planning, development, preparation, or perpetration of actions that constituted a crime or were undertaken in furtherance of activity that, if effectuated, would have constituted a crime. (b) CONSPIRACY.—A conspiracy to engage in white supremacy inspired hate crime shall be determined to exist— (1) between two or more persons engaged in the planning, development, preparation, or perpetration of a white supremacy inspired hate crime; or (2) between two or more persons— (A) at least one of whom engaged in the planning, development, preparation, or perpetration of a white supremacy inspired hate crime; and (B) at least one of whom published mate- rial advancing white supremacy, white supremacist ideology, antagonism based on ‘‘replacement theory’’, or hate speech that vilifies or is otherwise directed against any non-White person or group, and such published material—(i) was published on a social media platform or by other means of publication with the likelihood that it would be viewed by persons who are predisposed to engaging in any action in furtherance of a white supremacy inspired hate crime, or who are susceptible to being encouraged to engage in actions in furtherance of a white supremacy inspired hate crime; (ii) could, as determined by a reasonable person, motivate actions by a person predisposed to engaging in a white supremacy inspired hate crime or by a person who is susceptible to being encouraged to engage in actions relating to a white supremacy inspired hate crime; and (iii) was read, heard, or viewed by a person who engaged in the planning, development, preparation, or perpetration of a white supremacy inspired hate crime.” – Here, a bridge to political targets is created by the legal definition of “conspiracy” and where only one of the parties has to be actively engaged as noted and as subjected to the “if effectuated” clause. It means that confidential human assets as were used in the Capitol “insurrection” entrapment operation could entrap those political targets. Moreover, if one takes exception to evidenced unmitigated illegal immigration and the rewriting of U.S. history as components of the Cloward-Piven strategy, one commits a “white supremacy hate crime” according to the to-be codified definition of “replacement theory,” which holds: “that left-leaning domestic or international elites, on their own initiative or under the direction of Jewish co-conspirators, are attempting to replace white citizens with nonwhite (i.e., Black, Hispanic, Asian, or Arab) immigrants. The immigrants’ increased presence in white countries, as the theory goes, in combination with their higher birth rates as compared with those of whites, will enable new nonwhite majorities in those countries to take control of national political and economic institutions, to dilute or destroy their host countries’ distinctive cultures and societies, and eventually to eliminate the host countries’ white populations. Some adherents of replacement theory have characterized these predicted changes as “white genocide.”
- “DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AUTHORITY, ENFORCEMENT, MONITORING, AND REPORTING.—The Department shall have authority to conduct operations and activities pursuant to this section, specifically—(1) with regard to information or evidence obtained by the Department of any action cited in this section, the Department shall have the authority to investigate, intercede, and undertake other actions that it deems necessary and appropriate to interdict, mitigate, or prevent such action from culminating in violent activity; (2) the Department shall have the authority to prosecute persons who engaged in actions cited in this section; and (3) the Uniform Crime Reporting Program in the Department of Justice shall maintain records of white supremacy inspired hate crimes and related actions cited in this section, and enforcement actions in response thereto. The Department shall provide annual reports to the appropriate committees in Congress that shall include information cited in this paragraph.” – Here, we note the Department of Justice and, by extension, the FBI’s codified authority to take action in pre-crime form, the DOJ/FBI authority to collect and develop target lists of political enemies by application of “white supremacy” and the DOJ/FBI authority to present annual reports to committees in Congress, which could include annexes such as the aforementioned target lists.
- “Section 4702 of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act (18 U.S.C. 249 note) is amended by adding at the end the following:
- ‘‘(11) Mass shootings and other hate crimes motivated by white supremacy have been increasing in frequency and intensity. These heinous and virulent crimes are inspired by conspiracy theories, blatant bigotry, and mythical falsehoods such as ‘‘replacement theory’’. All instances must be prevented, and severe criminal penalties must be applied to their perpetrators.’’.” – Here, the direct linkages to the evidenced Second Amendment component stands to be codified and in ways that again function in “pre-crime” forms that result in targeting political enemies with “severe criminal penalties.”
MORE NEWS: U.S. Gov Stonewalling On COVID Info Despite Biden’s Bill To Declassify – Rand Paul [VIDEO]
The spine of the series The Hunt Is On is comprised of “white nationalism” [white supremacy and “systemic racism”], “domestic terrorism”/”domestic terrorist”, the Second Amendment, and leveraging the domestic terrorism/terrorist angles to leverage otherwise extraconstitutional authority to target the Biden administration’s political enemies. Therein, the targeting of President Trump further serves as a bridge to those political targets. Disturbingly and in dystopian fashion, now we see evidence for all of those components directly or contextually within Jackson Lee’s introduced bill.
What it means is that although the evidenced series may be disturbing, by all appearances, that granular analysis is on the mark. If Jackson Lee’s bill is signed into law, it will become a codified and weaponized tool to further target and vector in on Biden’s political opposition with a corrupt and criminal federal apparatus.
Quick - Do This Before Biden “Fixes” Your Retirement Plan Next…
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Red Voice Media. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
Reads like it’s about black people. Sounds like it’s really about the Biden Crime Family and the current US criminal cable wanted to set into law a precedent that provides for themselves not being lynched–which could very well happen.
Sheila Jackson is merely more fallout from Article 6’s Christian test ban whereby mandatory biblical qualifications for civil leaders were also eliminated, as well as everyone who has endorsed, promoted, or sworn allegiance to the biblically seditious Constitution.
For evidence that the Constitution is biblically seditious, see free online book “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective,” in which every Article and Amendment is *examined* by the Bible, at Bible versus Constitution dot org. Click on the top entry on our Online Book page.
For more regarding Article 6’s Christian test ban, see Chapter 9 “Article 6: The Supreme Law of the Land.”
Find out how much you really know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our 10-question Constitution Survey in the sidebar and receive a free copy of the 85-page “Primer” of “BL vs. USC.”