Governments are planning to push central financial institution digital currencies, and the fall down of Silicon Valley Bank might also have given them the best possibility to introduce this nightmarish surveillance technology.
The heightened worry of financial institution runs and the developing calls for extra authority control to stop any other Silicon Valley Bank-style match have created a house for governments to swoop in and current Central Bank Digital Currencies or CBDCs as the solution. Prepare for these speaking factors to turn out to be outstanding as governments ramp up their efforts to push CBDC. Within days of  Silicon Valley Bank’s failure, it was described as the “first social-media fuelled bank run in history,” and fears about “social media disinfo” started to be stoked.
Similar talking points were quickly echoed by politicians.  United States House Financial Services Chair Patrick McHenry described it as “the first Twitter fuelled bank run.” During an emergency conference call with high-ranking federal government officials,  Senator Mark Kelly asked if the officials were reaching out to tech platforms to monitor “misinformation” and “bad actors” and inquired about the possibility of censoring social media posts to avoid a bank run.
Governments are likely to seize upon and amplify these fears of social media bank runs as they push new regulations and proposals in the wake of the Silicon Valley Bank collapse. And they’re likely to position CBDCs as the solution. Be on the lookout for suggestions from officials that CBDCs are “safe” and immune to social media bank runs. While such promises may soothe citizens’ fear of bank runs, this fear will be replaced with something far worse for those that embrace CBDCs programmable money that allows the government to dictate when, where, or if citizens can spend their money.
As Silicon Valley Bank collapsed, the prospect of a widespread financial contagion event loomed. Companies said they were  left unable to pay staff, large online platforms  delayed payments to sellers, and other companies  revealed that they held significant portions of their cash at Silicon Valley Bank.
While the US government stepping in to guarantee Silicon Valley Bank customer deposits appears to have averted much of the wider financial collateral damage President Joe Biden has already  vowed to “reduce the risks of this happening again.”
Get ready for governments to capitalize on the fear of financial instability and use this narrative to push new rules and regulations that will supposedly provide financial stability. They’ll likely blame banks for creating financial blow-ups, insist that governments need more control over the financial system, and present CBDCs as the tool that will bring financial stability.
Those that fall for this fantasy will be locked into a system that’s anything but stable. Instead of bringing financial stability, CBDCs will force citizens into a constant state of financial uncertainty where they never know when the rules about how they can spend their money will change or how significant the changes will be.
Many governments have already  cited making direct payments to citizens as one of the main use cases for a CBDC, according to a Research and Analysis pdf file called the Money and Payments: The U.S. Dollar in the Age of Digital Transformation. If more banks fail, expect governments to start increasingly focusing on CBDCs as a solution for affected customers. We should be on the lookout for governments urging citizens to download CBDC wallet apps during times of financial uncertainty. They’ll likely assert that this is a more streamlined or efficient way for customers to have instant access to their deposits in the event of bank failures.
While CBDCs may provide some short-term convenience during financially turbulent times, citizens that choose CBDCs will be sacrificing their freedom and privacy long-term. Once they’ve been ushered into this system, they’ll lose their ability to transact anonymously and  only be allowed to spend their CBDCs on government-approved purchases.
During the last major crisis, the Covid pandemic, governments leveraged uncertainty and fear of the virus to push dystopian surveillance tech such as contact tracing, vaccine passports, and digital ID. Expect them to use the same playbook when pushing CBDCs.
Governments are likely to use talking points that tap into people’s fear of losing money during times of economic turbulence and use false promises of safety and stability to lure citizens into a CBDC system.
Governments have already made it clear that they plan to strip users of their financial freedom and privacy  by imposing CBDC spending limits and controls and removing anonymity.
Written by Lionel Eddy, a freelance writer specializing in current affairs and activist from London, UK, he has campaigned against mandatory vaccination as well as the COVID-19 regulations. Eddy has also campaigned against the rollout of 5G masts in the UK, citing it as a radiation and health hazard.
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Red Voice Media. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.