On 12 Jan 23, AG Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice appointed Robert K. Hur “to serve as special counsel to conduct the investigation of matters that were the subject of the initial investigation by U.S. Attorney John R. Lausch Jr. related to the possible unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or other records discovered at the Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement and the Wilmington, Delaware, private residence of President Joseph R. Biden Jr.”

After initially examining Hur’s appointment and two days later, I made a clear projection in the 14 Jan 23 analysis: “Falling back on another longstanding position thoroughly examined in all of my work on Special Counsel John Durham, by all appearances the appointment of Special Counsel Robert K. Hur to examine the Biden/classified documents matter stands to be another concealment and cover-up operation rather than one designed to pursue justice to the fullest extent of the law.”

Defend Your Retirement Against Bidenflation

The following day’s analysis further expanded on the projected trajectory of Hur’s appointment to special counsel to establish a major premise in the aggregate analysis: Reconciling Biden Classified Docs, Special Counsel Robert Hur and the Mar-A-Lago Entrapment Operation to Project Forward.

The major premise expanded from an existing and considerably older one, which holds that the Intelligence Community was engaged in lawfare and other operations to preclude former President Donald J. Trump from the 2024 ballot as the best viable approach to interceding on the unavoidable circumstance of a known and understood forthcoming Trump victory.

After the Biden Penn Center revelations in January 2023, it was very clear that Hur’s special counsel tasking was covertly designed for concealment and cover-up operations and that attribution to the Intelligence Community immediately foretold Hur’s eventual decision on prosecutorial discretion: prosecute Biden or not?

In February 2024, DOJ Special Counsel Robert Hur issued his declination to prosecute then US Senator and Vice President and now President Joe Biden for unlawful retention of classified and top secret documents.

Stop Risking Your Safety: Uncover the Truth Behind the Best Survival Caliber!

Hur’s declination is another stunningly brazen example and reliable piece of evidence that is emblematic of the Joe Biden/Merrick Garland system of two-tiered justice.

This contrived and binary system of so-called “justice” is designed in service to its overlords and in particular, Attorney General Merrick Garland and his tasking from the nation’s chief law enforcement officer represented by the Office of the Executive, which is occupied by an illegitimate Biden.

Garland and his DOJ have viciously defended the stolen 2020 election by leveraging the powers and authorities contained in the DOJ’s charter just as they have viciously attacked anyone seeking to redress it .

This system conceals and covers-up Biden’s pervasive criminality at the same time it hunts Biden’s political opposition with absolute impunity.

Of course, in his declination decision Hur cited Biden’s diminished mental acuity as a mitigating circumstance.

The Intelligence Community ensured that both factions of its Uniparty were outraged at Hur’s decision that is also designed to sow further national discord and chaos in the most important “election” year in history.

Consider the pattern of two-tiered justice that matriculates out of the Biden/Garland DOJ:

There are peculiarities in Hur’s February testimony on Capitol Hill and his declination to prosecute Biden relative to the fact set surrounding the DOJ/FBI raid and entrapment operation at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate that deserve close scrutiny.

There was no legal predicate in the DOJ/FBI raid of former President Donald J. Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate for his alleged unlawful retention of classified and top secret information.

The Intelligence Community manufactured that raid as a form of political projection packaged inside a deflection mechanism to steer the national dialogue to fraudulently constructed crimes alleged to have been committed by Trump and away from the exact same crimes actually committed by Biden.

Critically, the Mar-a-Lago raid had parallel tasking that was actually the covert primary objective: recover the “Obamagate” dossier of evidence incriminating Biden, Obama, Clinton and the rest of the “Russian collusion” squad: SPIES LIKE US: Analysis Confirmed, Obamagate Evidence Recovery Was Basis of IC Operations in Mar-a-Lago Raid.

There are legal distinctions being entirely discarded in Trump’s case, where the President communicated with the National Archives [NARA] to curate his retention of documents according to policy and law despite a constructed narrative to the contrary.

One distinction is that the President’s legal authority to declassify information is not as concrete as people may think and the fluidity and application of that authority severely erodes at the predicate for the DOJ/FBI Mar-a-Lago raid/entrapment operation.

That authority is also a component of the IC’s constructed arguments against Trump.

Another important distinction is the NARA admission that its approach to Trump’s departure from office in 2021 and the likelihood of his Presidential library/archive was completely anomalous according to conventional NARA practices.

Then Trump counsel Tim Parlatore explains: “The National Archives ordinarily rents a facility in the town where the president’s moving to, and then they move all the boxes from the White House directly to that facility where they remain under National Archives control. For whatever reason, NARA chose not to do that with Donald Trump.”

Let’s be clear in saying that when a federal agency with sole oversight over important and impactful presidential matters like establishing a Presidential library/archive makes an informed decision to anomalously handle a particular president differently than all of his predecessors; and when that president happens to be the most vilified and aggressively attacked President in US history – Donald J. Trump – it’s a set-up and more specifically, it’s a set-up by the Intelligence Community.

That’s the layman’s explanation for what I’m laying-out in this analysis.

Otherwise, none of this operational architecture would have assembled itself with such precision and with such a hollow but highly propagated narrative.

*Post link

Here is that architecture:

1. President Trump routinely cites the Presidential Records Act of 1978 [PRA] in his authority and defense.
2. The Presidential Records Act clearly states that, “Upon the conclusion of a President’s term of office, or if a President serves consecutive terms upon the conclusion of the last term, the Archivist of the United States shall assume responsibility for the custody, control, and preservation of, and access to, the Presidential records of that President.”
3. NARA is therefore the statutory federal administrator for the PRA.
4. As the statutory federal administrator for the PRA, NARA becomes an interface between the President and records retention laws.
5. The Intelligence Community compromised and leveraged that interface to vector in on Trump.
6. NARA made an informed decision directly pertaining to its authority as the PRA administrator where it “chose” to “assume responsibility” for Trump’s Presidential library/archive differently than it has for all other presidents.
7. By constructing this difference, NARA creates a straw man argument that serves as the narrative behind and legal predicate for the Intelligence Community lawfare operations functioning to preclude Trump from the 2024 ballot.

GO DEEPER

On how the Intelligence Community engages in perception management operations by constructing Hegelian Dialectics to determine mainstream reality in a guest submission from Shanghai Moon: Guest Submission: The Hegelian Dialectics of our Crime Wave.

President Trump was statutorily authorized to retain the documents contained in the Mar-a-Lago SCIF, which is why NARA “chose” to handle Trump differently thereby creating a division between Trump and NARA created by a straw man argument that would become the public national dialogue and the legal predicate for IC constructed DOJ/FBI lawfare operations.

To the contrary, President Biden who was then a US Senator and Vice President had no such legal authority to declassify or retain documents.

Moreover, the aggravating circumstances around Biden’s retention of documents centers on his role as a broker to China and other hostile foreign nations and interests; making it all far more egregious and downright treasonous, which is why the IC is determined in its concealment and cover-up operations.

Hillary Clinton’s private and unsecured email server isn’t much different as viewed through the same lens.

All facts considered and regardless of them, it was Trump who was raided and prosecuted by the Biden/Garland DOJ/FBI and not Joe Biden.

Rather, Biden gets to stroll-out no worse for the wear because he’s old, feeble, demented and in a state of significantly diminished mental acuity according to Hur and anyone not a functional idiot or living under a rock.

Moreover, it all makes Biden a perfect candidate for the 25th Amendment remembering how the Intelligence Community threatened Trump with the same all throughout his administration; especially relative to COVID-19.

Plugging Hur and his declination into the broader picture, it’s clear that the Intelligence Community is inverting society as a mechanism of overthrow and in collaboration with China and other hostile foreign actors.

BLACK = WHITE WHEN PRODUCING DATA FOR DOJ CRIME STATISTICS: This is more direct evidence of the legal architecture being put in place permitting the DOJ to hunt Biden's political opposition under a fraudulent predicate. Once one comes to understand this architecture, the problem… https://t.co/w7RMXpivOb

— Political Moonshine (@PoliticalMoons2) March 13, 2024

GO DEEPER

On the inversion of society caused by China wielding cultural Marxism like a battle axe in an asymmetrical, irregular and undeclared war against America: Office for Access Director Lays-Out DOJ Architecture for Cultural Marxism.

On a timeline constrained by the 2024 election, we’re getting to the nitty-gritty of things and with an understanding of the playbook compounded by the unavoidable circumstance that is the barreling freight train of Donald J. Trump, the Intelligence Community’s list of viable options to effectively address the status quo has become severely restricted.

This makes the IC highly predictable and that produces laser accurate projections like the Hur Special Counsel projection and a long list of others.

Oddly enough and with every decision and action the Biden/Garland DOJ/FBI make and execute, China seems to benefit and there is no more obvious case than Special Counsel Robert Hur’s declination to prosecute Joe Biden.

That’s how Marxist communism works.

As if I called-up perhaps the dumbest Vice President in US history and duped her into publicly appearing to make my case for me that the Biden/Garland DOJ functions as a system of two-tiered justice attacking its political enemies with impunity, right on time, Kamala Harris did just that in politically projecting that President Trump will “weaponize the Department of Justice against his enemies.”

Kamala Harris claims President Trump will "weaponize the Department of Justice against his enemies" — which is exactly what the Biden administration is doing right now. pic.twitter.com/4uHDV9uj2Q

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) March 14, 2024

The analysis remains on straight rails, ahead of the “news” by years and keeping us on course for a tumultuous year ahead.

-End-

If you appreciate the analysis at Political Moonshine, please consider actively sharing it on social media where accounts remain ghost- and shadow-banned and sharing the work is difficult. Thank you.

The CIA’s ‘Intelligence Coup Of The Century’: From Thesaurus To Rubicon And Beyond

Self Employed or Business Owner? Find Out How To Claim A MAJOR Tax Credit

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Red Voice Media. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.