In private dialogue with Marco Polo founder and former Trump White House advisor Garrett Ziegler recently, Ziegler indicated an interesting development pertaining to his work and the work of Marco Polo that is featured in its definitive and authoritative forensic dossier on the Biden Family laptop. The backdrop to Ziegler’s remarks are contained in the aggregate analysis covering Marco Polo and its forensic dossier. That analysis is found in its own series and these articles are the two most recent pieces:
Gateway Pundit Finally Issues Formal Apology to Marco Polo Over Biden Laptop Evidence
Defend Your Retirement Against Bidenflation
The developments in Ziegler’s remarks lay-out down two different paths: 1-evidentiary extracts from the Marco Polo forensic dossier being admitted in two separate pieces of litigation and 2-the problematic aspects of the dossier’s admission in court for those engaged in operational lawfare designed to discredit the dossier and undermine its authors.
Refer to the series of analysis for those details and sourced evidence.
Ziegler passed along the following source to accompany his dialogue remembering that as a Dan Abrams creation, Law & Crime is a heavily left-centered publication that fits squarely into the Intelligence Community propaganda system.
Stop Risking Your Safety: Uncover the Truth Behind the Best Survival Caliber!
Despite its political bias, the Law & Crime piece lays-out patently obvious issues.
The first issue pertains to the constructed operational lawfare targeting Ziegler and Marco Polo where Law & Crime provides a succinct introduction for what follows: “The former Trump White House policy analyst being sued by Hunter Biden for allegedly violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) is now gunning for the judge’s recusal, claiming that the totality of the facts and circumstances at play, including that the judge donated “at least $1,600” to President Joe Biden’s 2020 campaign, make a new jurist necessary.”
It distills down to fidelity to impartiality from a Biden-appointed judge, who contributed to Biden’s campaign, and who stands to directly impact the House impeachment inquiry on Biden; and whether impartiality can be achieved in such circumstances.
It can’t and far from it given this is the architecture for a rigged system where fraudulently constructed cases rest on greased skids towards predetermined verdicts.
Consider that, “Garrett Ziegler’s attorney Robert Tyler argued Thursday that if U.S. District Judge Hernan Vera, a 2023 Joe Biden appointee, rules in favor of Hunter Biden, then there is a real possibility Ziegler’s Marco Polo websites, the ones that posted the so-called “Biden Laptop Report,” will be “shut down” — with potential consequences for Republicans’ presidential impeachment inquiry.”
Moreover, ““The outcome of this litigation could affect the outcome of the presidential impeachment inquiry. If Judge Vera grants the injunction, it would prevent the public, media, and Congress from accessing Defendants’ investigative reporting and contents on the Biden Laptop, possibly impacting the impeachment investigation,” the Ziegler motion warned. “A reasonable person would question whether Judge Vera has a bias in ensuring that President Biden stays in office, given his political contributions to President Biden’s 2020 presidential election campaign and his appointment to the federal court by President Biden just three months before this case was assigned to him.””
The implications of Judge Vera’s ruling are heavily consequential relative to public interest and the public’s right to know how their “elected” president’s past and present entanglements directly affect the nation’s posterity given how, “The defense again emphasized that if Vera were to hand Hunter Biden a win it could “prevent and inhibit the public, media and Congress from accessing highly relevant evidence to the impeachment inquiry of President Biden,” in whom the judge “made a financial investment” and for whose reelection Vera has “an obvious interest and affinity.””
Ziegler’s counsel was adamant in further, “Arguing that Vera has the power to “affect the outcome of the presidential impeachment inquiry” with a potentially far-reaching ruling in Hunter Biden’s favor, Ziegler claimed the stakes couldn’t be higher.”
In all of this and from the very beginning, the only thing that has mattered and matters now is the TRUTH.
If [when] Judge Vera’s ruling is in favor of the plaintiffs, the TRUTH will be the real victim: ““If the relief requested by Plaintiff is granted, Defendants may be forced to shut down the websites. There is no other website accessible to the public that contains this important information,” the motion continued. “An injunction would eliminate access of the public, media, and members of Congress to the information on the websites that implicate matters of national and international concern – the potential foreign compromise and criminal wrongdoing of the First Family of the United States. Furthermore, an injunction might substantially impede the impeachment inquiry as well.””
The Law & Crime piece went on to describe what it says is the evidence of Ziegler’s criminality in violation of federal law saying Ziegler, “and co-defendants in the California federal case engaged in “unlawful data access as a matter of law,” as opposed to engaging in “protected” First Amendment activity.”
By allowing the summary findings in the current analysis to frame our lens, we can make a projection for Judge Vera’s ruling.
The summary findings indicate widespread operational cover-up by the Intelligence Community that has been occurring since before Biden was fraudulently inaugurated.
For example, consider how the entire basis for the Mar-a-Lago raid was to recover a different dossier possessed by former President Donald J. Trump that fully incriminated Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, John Brennan, et al. in “Obamagate” operations better known as “Russian collusion” [think back to the 05 Jan 17 holdover meeting in Obama’s Oval Office to do “Russian collusion” “by the book,” and as agreed upon (the literal definition of which is conspiracy to commit treason)]: SPIES LIKE US: Analysis Confirmed, Obamagate Evidence Recovery Was Basis of IC Operations in Mar-a-Lago Raid.
MORE NEWS: Tucker: Klaus Schwab, Transgenderism, and AI | Russian Philosopher Aleksandr Dugin [VIDEO]
Or consider how Biden’s DOJ under AG Merrick Garland system of two-tiered justice is engaged in operational cover-up for international crimes committed by the Biden Crime Family; especially in Ukraine [Burisma] as the analysis indicates: INTERNATIONAL COVER-UP: DOJ’s ‘War Crimes Accountability Team’ and ICPA to Veil Biden’s Biowarfare, Money Laundering, Fraud and Worse.
Or consider how the same DOJ is deconstructing the FTX/SBF Ukrainian-based money laundering and political kickback operation to the best possible ends that unavoidable circumstances allow [like FTX clients losing $8 billion – hearing people complain about that is unavoidable]: FTX, SBF, UKRAINE: Sam Bankman-Fried Faces 100 Years in 28 Mar 24 Sentencing, Will Receive Reduced Sentence As Crimes Are Rebranded “Echoing Point”.
On those three examples alone but with plenty more in reserve; and as overlaid by the jurisdiction of a federal court case filed in the State of California, we can make a highly plausible projection.
Jurisdiction is the first order and from personal experience alone serving as an investigator/analyst in one federal lawsuit and as the plaintiff in my own personal federal lawsuit, the Ninth Circuit is a fundamentally flawed and biased circuit for any ruling favorable to Ziegler and Marco Polo.
Tack on Judge Vera’s personal bias demonstrated by the actions of donating to the political campaign of the father of the plaintiff, who just happens to be President of the United States; and who just happens to be facing an impeachment trial that stands to be highly and credibly informed by the defendants’ technically accurate forensic dossier, and it’s clear that Judge Vera is going to rule in favor of Hunter Biden ergo in favor of Joe Biden; and full circle we go.
The analysis indicates that it’s a foregone conclusion that Vera will rule in Hunter Biden’s favor and by doing so, will rule in favor of the President who appointed him.
As a secondary projection, recall that impeachment is a function of the House and specifically the Judiciary Committee where Intelligence Community guardrail and gatekeeper House Speaker Mike Johnson operates accordingly.
Therein, Joe Biden’s impeachment remains a carrot on a stick at best [from mid-December]: “Although House Republicans voted Wednesday to formalize an impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden, GOP leadership has made a point to indicate the move does not mean impeaching the president is inevitable, even as pressure grows within the party and among the Republican base.”
It’s not clear if Joe Biden will be impeached but if he is, it’s plausible to think two things: 1-the Marco Polo dossier will be factored-out and 2-because there is “insufficient evidence” of crimes committed or even clear motive behind those crimes, Biden will get the Comey/Clinton treatment where no prosecution, or in the case of impeachment no conviction [since impeachment itself is a prosecution in the trial venue of the US Senate] will be handed down.
Biden will make a shameful but scot-free exit from 2024.
This will all continue to be done at the Intelligence Community’s marching orders and according to its architecture to remove Biden from the 2024 ballot, which obviously envelops any impeachment proceedings that Judge Vera’s ruling stands to directly impact; and which has been ongoing for nearly a year-and-a-half.
The Intelligence Community operations for widespread cover-ups continue, Judge Vera will do his part in that and Garrett Ziegler and Marco Polo face a unfavorable ruling.
In the end and thanks to the First Family of Crime, it’s the TRUTH that loses and losing right along with it is the American people.
-End-
The CIA’s ‘Intelligence Coup Of The Century’: From Thesaurus To Rubicon And Beyond
Self Employed or Business Owner? Find Out How To Claim A MAJOR Tax Credit
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.