The deep and broad Moonshine analysis of the Biden Crime Family and its exploits of enterprise fraud in places like Ukraine and China has caused a tarnishing and dark stain on this nation’s past and present. Unless the American people come to their collective senses, unify, and fight to take back their country, it will also impact the future. The private equity entanglements in energy and other contexts evidence a world where the surname “Biden” is peddled for influence and personal enrichment at the expense and to the detriment of the rest of us. This occurs in the worst places and in the worst ways.
To augment this analysis and deepen our understanding of the Biden Crime Family, we must examine an unbelievable and literally explosive set of developments.
This remarkable confluence of events is one that even the staunchest authors of fiction would struggle to cobble together, and in non-fiction form, it factually places the Biden Crime Family in the dead center of it all.
If the Bidens’ corruption and criminality are not already understood, readers should consider familiarizing themselves by using the website to identify and comprehend both with a recommendation to focus on things like energy, China, CEFC China Energy Company, BHR Partners, Ukraine, Burisma, FTX, USAID, and other related domains.
It’s important to pause and remember that the Marco Polo forensic dossier on the Biden laptop [Hunter’s laptop] is a substantial tranche of primary and secondary source evidence to substantiate the analysis on the Biden Crime Family.
Therefore, Hunter Biden’s lawsuit against Garrett Ziegler and Marco Polo serves as a critical factor and lens for our examination here and for the Marco Polo evidence featured near the bottom.
To properly frame that lens, yesterday’s article is required reading: Intel Community Criminal Forgery Seeks To Discredit Biden Laptop & Marco Polo
With our contextual backdrop in place, we move on to the explosive new developments.
ARLINGTON EXPLOSION, JAMES YOO & CFIUS
*Arlington, VA home of former Head of Global Security at the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).
We begin with a headline from Zero Hedge: Massive Explosion Destroys Home Of Crazed Man In Arlington, Virginia Neighborhood.
According to our source, the massive explosion that rocked Arlington, VA, last night occurred at the home of James Yoo, who is presumed dead and who was the “the former Head of Global Security at the US government’s “Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).”
Authorities had responded to reports of the firing of a flare gun at Yoo’s residence when this happened:
House explosion near Washington D.C.
— Red Voice Media (@redvoicenews) December 5, 2023
Readers are left to their own to examine Yoo’s evidenced background as a lawfare-wielding far leftist who was already familiar to the FBI and who was potentially mentally unwell and living under the thumb of self-imposed paranoia.
Relative to Yoo, our focus is CFIUS because, by all appearances, it’s a cover mechanism for the Biden Crime Family’s corruption and criminality.
This is CFIUS, and its jurisdiction and authority thrust it to the center of the Biden Crime Family’s corruption and crime: “CFIUS is an interagency committee authorized to review certain transactions involving foreign investment in the United States and certain real estate transactions by foreign persons, in order to determine the effect of such transactions on the national security of the United States. CFIUS operates pursuant to section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (section 721), and as implemented by Executive Order 11858, as amended, and the regulations at chapter VIII of title 31 of the Code of Federal Regulations.”
Note the CFIUS Committee composition and relative jurisdictions, further noting the White House’s ability to steer the committee [emphasis added]:
The Secretary of the Treasury is the Chairperson of CFIUS, and notices to CFIUS are received, processed, and coordinated at the staff level by the Staff Chairperson of CFIUS, who is the Director of the Office of Investment Review and Investigation in the Department of the Treasury.
The members of CFIUS include the heads of the following departments and offices:
- Department of the Treasury (chair)
- Department of Justice
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Defense
- Department of State
- Department of Energy
- Office of the U.S. Trade Representative
- Office of Science & Technology Policy
The following White House offices also observe and, as appropriate, participate in CFIUS’s activities:
- Office of Management & Budget
- Council of Economic Advisors
- National Security Council
- National Economic Council
- Homeland Security Council
The Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Labor are non-voting, ex-officio members of CFIUS with roles as defined by statute and regulation.
The interagency functions of CFIUS envelop the Department of State via the State’s Investment Affairs Division for International Finance and Development, where “The Office of Investment Affairs (OIA) promotes sound investment policies in support of U.S. jobs, economic growth, and prosperity. We protect U.S. national security in the context of foreign investment in the United States, while sustaining the open investment policy of the United States. We promote responsible business conduct and, to this end, house the U.S. National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines.”
Citing Treasury as the primary agency, State references OIA to indicate that “Foreign Investment in the United States and U.S. National Security: OIA represents the Department of State on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). CFIUS is an inter-agency committee led by the U.S. Department of Treasury that reviews mergers and acquisitions of U.S. businesses by foreigners to determine whether such transactions could affect U.S. national security.”
With CFIUS squared up at the center of the Biden Crime Family, consider this as framed by the evidenced position that executive orders are customarily used by the Executive to mitigate forthcoming fallout from unavoidable circumstances or to manage the scene after those circumstances have already been unpacked publicly: “On September 15, 2022, President Biden issued Executive Order 14083 reflecting the evolving national security threat landscape and underscoring the critical role of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States in responding to new and emerging threats and vulnerabilities in the context of foreign investment. The Executive Order elaborates and expands on the existing list of factors that CFIUS considers, as appropriate, when reviewing transactions for national security risks, and describes potential national security implications in key areas.”
The scope of national security is critical because it permits the federal apparatus to throw a veil over the evidence and truth within the parameters of managing classified and top-secret information to the extent that such evidence could be hidden from the public.
Consider this 15 Sep 22 Fact Sheet issued by the Biden Administration [emphasis added]:
This Executive Order (E.O. or the Order) is the first E.O. since CFIUS was established in 1975 to provide formal Presidential direction on the risks that the Committee should consider when reviewing a covered transaction. The Order explicitly recognizes that some countries use foreign investment to obtain access to sensitive data and technologies for purposes that are detrimental to U.S. national security and seeks to ensure that CFIUS remains an effective tool to combat these threats now and in the future. More broadly, this Order explicitly ties CFIUS’ role, actions, and capabilities with the Administration’s overall national security priorities—including preserving U.S. technological leadership, protecting Americans’ sensitive data, and enhancing U.S. supply chain resilience—to ensure that the United States’ national security tools and objectives are consistent and mutually reinforcing.
Specifically, this E.O. provides direction to CFIUS by elaborating on existing statutory factors and adds several national security factors for CFIUS to consider during its review process. The Order also acknowledges the importance of continuous improvements to the foreign investment review process and directs CFIUS to continue to regularly review its processes, practices, and regulations to ensure that they remain responsive to evolving national security threats.
Please allow me to ask this basic question: Is there a country with significant private equity entanglements that criminally implicates the sitting U.S. president, his son Hunter, and other family members and is engaged in the evidenced theft of sensitive U.S. data, information, laser-accurate, and technologies that are detrimental to U.S. national security?
Yes – China.
It’s the same China that funds the Penn Biden Center, which my analysis evidences as a hub for the funneling of classified and top secret information to Beijing.
Allow me to ask another multifaceted question: What did James Yoo know, how much did he know, when did he know it, and did the Biden Crime Family benefit from his demise?
Those answers save one remain to be determined since there is little available on Yoo’s bio, and what was there is, by all appearances, being quickly scrubbed.
The one answer we do have is this: Yes, the Biden Crime Family stands to benefit from Yoo’s demise, but he’s not the only one, as longtime Moonshine contributor “Wall St.” nicely explains:
What isn’t said [in the article]: CFIUS is the committee within the [Treasury Department with interagency function extending to the] State Department that is responsible for approval/disapproval of foreign investments in US businesses that are involved in activities that are strategically important. Defense, energy, technology, etc. This is the committee that approved the sale of Uranium One to Ukrainian oligarchs, the sale of an aircraft bushings company to the Bohai Harvest Fund, and also a nuclear power company also to Bohai Harvest. Who does CFIUS report to? The [Treasury and the] Secretary of State….who at the time of these approvals was none other than Hillary Clinton.
Moonshine contributor “Wall St.”
That’s big big-picture understanding that shines a light on Yoo’s demise.
Does it add another name to the Clinton hit list?
IMPEACHMENT, HEARINGS, TESTIMONY, MARCO POLO, CFIUS & OWASCO PC
Take our analysis and big picture understanding courtesy of “Wall St.” and overlay them with the balance of new developments:
1-As Intelligence Community asset and Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson trolls the public with the possibility of Joe Biden’s impeachment, including help from House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, who is investigating “President Biden’s pattern of lies, corruption, and obstruction,” Hunter Biden has agreed to testify publicly. Without a closed-door interview session to augment any public testimony, this is problematic for the reason[s] stated above. Any public hearing would be limited in scope because of the national security implications, which can be legally and technically veiled. All it takes is the federal apparatus to apply classified or top-secret tags on the evidence. This is why Republicans are demanding a closed-door session; otherwise, the endeavor to uncover the truth will not be fruitful.
2-We also see Biden’s Chinese entanglements ramp up in problematic fashion for the Biden Crime Family as Comer drives forward: “Hunter Biden sent monthly payments to his father out of a bank account he used to receive money from Chinese business associates, according to newly released bank records revealed by House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, who shared a Monday video on X detailing redacted bank transfers to Joe Biden from Hunter’s Owasco P.C. bank account. “Today, the House Oversight Committee is releasing subpoenaed bank records that show Hunter Biden’s business entity, Owasco PC, made direct monthly payments to Joe Biden. This wasn’t a payment from Hunter Biden’s personal account but an account for his corporation that received payments from China and other shady corners of the world,” Comer says in the video, adding that the payments began in September 2018 – six months before Biden announced his candidacy in the 2020 election. Payments to Joe Biden from Hunter’s Owasco PC corporate account are part of a pattern revealing Joe Biden knew about, participated in, and benefited from his family’s influence-peddling schemes. As the Bidens received millions from foreign nationals and companies in China, Russia, Ukraine, Romania, and Kazakhstan, Joe Biden dined with his family’s foreign associates, spoke to them by speakerphone, had coffee, attended meetings, and ultimately received payments that were funded by his family’s business dealings,” reads an accompanying release from the Oversight Committee.” [Zero Hedge]
3-Recalling our intro above, Marco Polo and its forensic dossier on the Biden laptop provide evidence on CFIUS and Owasco PC relative to the Biden Crime Family’s illegal and treasonous entanglements [readers are encouraged to examine the Marco Polo evidence independently and further explore the full dossier in support of the Moonshine analysis]:
Coinciding with an all-time high for the evidenced push for Biden’s impeachment and bracketed on one end by the 2024 electoral timeline, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) has been thrust to the heart of the Biden Crime Family’s; and specifically Joe and Hunter Biden’s, corruption, criminality and treason.
This has occurred in conjunction with a 15 Sep 22 Executive Order issued by Joe Biden in a way to envelop CFIUS, State, Treasury, and other agencies and departments in a design to obfuscate the truth and engage in cover-up operations.
Last night, James Yoo, the former Head of Global Security at CFIUS and a potential witness in Biden’s impeachment and to a wide swath of criminality committed by Joe and Hunter Biden, Hillary Clinton and plausibly Barack Obama, Robert Mueller, Andrew Weissman [as a Mueller functionary] et al., perished in a massive explosion that occurred during the execution of a search warrant.
I believe answering the question “cui bono?” is our best bet to attribute meaning to Yoo’s demise.
The answer to “cui bono?” is an obvious one.
What did James Yoo know, and who stood to be imprisoned or worse because of it?
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Red Voice Media. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.